Paul M Cat Ross

Talksport - the main station discussion place
Post Reply
User avatar
Juice Terry
Registered user
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 am

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Juice Terry »

Not a clue
LUFC

User avatar
Champagne and Roses
Registered user
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 8:46 am

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Champagne and Roses »

Erskine Might wrote:
Juice Terry wrote:
Erskine Might wrote:
Who are you?


A policeman knew my name.
DK: And tonight’s musical homework is lyrics with “who” in them starting of course, and where else would we start, with “Who Are You” which not only contains the word “who” but is also by The Who, buy one get one free as it were, so by the end of the evening we’ll have assembled a veritable Who’s Who of [EDIT].
Blocked by Andy Jacobs since 2011
You might even spot me having a bit of veal

User avatar
the puddin
Registered user
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:12 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by the puddin »

Hardly any sport at all. Utter shite. At least the two mikes were amusing when they didn't do sport.
"It's what we do...."

User avatar
shivah
Registered user
Posts: 18773
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by shivah »

the puddin wrote:Hardly any sport at all. Utter shite. At least the two mikes were amusing when they didn't do sport.


he'll still be on a breakfast show wage and contract and it's probably cheaper for News UK to stick him on talkSHITE overnight then bring in someone else.

How a man with such a speech defect be thought of as good enough for wadio is beyond me.
Grunt is a Chunt.

James90125
Registered user
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:39 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by James90125 »

Erskine Might wrote:
Juice Terry wrote:
Erskine Might wrote:He's interviewed me a few times over the years and he's always been really nice. (In contrast to Martin Kellner, who, when recording an interview, couldn't have been arsed, did zero research, paid no attention to what I was saying, and whose amusing persona - which up until then I liked a lot - appeared to have been left on a peg for when the red light comes on.) Ross at least seems to be interested, does his homework and works hard to make a conversation engaging. I must admit I'd found his cheesey TV appearances a turn-off, and I can't say I go out of my way to listen to his radio shows, but he's more of a pro than many around today.


Who are you?


A policeman knew my name.

Jim Carver

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34291
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Carlos J »

Clicked on before the 2am news. Now asking about sequels in movies for the next hour. What do you think about sequels? Do you give them the benefit of the doubt? What sequels are better than the original? Local radio 101. :roll:

Old MG could have done this better and is far more amusing. Click back on to the legend Rhod on 5Live.

A reminder of old poor confused Paul from 2014: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... s-him.html Comments are Mail and amusing.

Posted this before, lovely sweater and blue Chelsea boots:

Image
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Erskine Might
Registered user
Posts: 2237
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:17 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Erskine Might »

Don't forget this, either:


User avatar
Erskine Might
Registered user
Posts: 2237
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:17 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Erskine Might »

James90125 wrote:
Erskine Might wrote:
Juice Terry wrote:
Erskine Might wrote:He's interviewed me a few times over the years and he's always been really nice. (In contrast to Martin Kellner, who, when recording an interview, couldn't have been arsed, did zero research, paid no attention to what I was saying, and whose amusing persona - which up until then I liked a lot - appeared to have been left on a peg for when the red light comes on.) Ross at least seems to be interested, does his homework and works hard to make a conversation engaging. I must admit I'd found his cheesey TV appearances a turn-off, and I can't say I go out of my way to listen to his radio shows, but he's more of a pro than many around today.


Who are you?


A policeman knew my name.

Jim Carver



He said, 'You can go sleep at home tonight If you can get up and walk away'. I staggered back to the underground, and the breeze blew back my hair. I remember throwin' punches around, and preachin' from my chair -' Hang on, this isn't me, it's Alan Brazil.

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34291
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Carlos J »

Click on. 10 facts about board games. Click off.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

dingdongthewitchisdead
Registered user
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:34 am
Location: london village north section

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by dingdongthewitchisdead »

stealing a living,like most on the station .
i never listen now .

User avatar
the puddin
Registered user
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:12 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by the puddin »

It's truly dreadful.
"It's what we do...."

User avatar
The Ghost of Alex Higgins
No longer the Bridesmaid
Posts: 39148
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Location: Cunt
Contact:

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by The Ghost of Alex Higgins »

the puddin wrote:It's truly dreadful.

Better than expected then
MAKING TALKFORUM GREAT AGAIN

User avatar
Zippy
Registered user
Posts: 6247
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 3:30 am
Location: London

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Zippy »

Paul Woss really does struggle to catch a break.
"talkFORUM royalty" - thursty.
"Talkforum's Alan Whicker! " - kevin04.
"Cunt" - sjbarca

User avatar
Lou Grant
Registered user
Posts: 5059
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2014 8:48 am
Location: With the chickens, crossing the road

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Lou Grant »

Erskine Might wrote:In contrast to Martin Kellner, who, when recording an interview, couldn't have been arsed, did zero research, paid no attention to what I was saying, and whose amusing persona - which up until then I liked a lot - appeared to have been left on a peg for when the red light comes on.

I love Kelner. If it's a subject he's interested in or a guest that has something interesting to say then he's brilliant, but he never fakes it for stuff he couldn't give a toss about. Same for his slot on H&J ... get him on a sport he loves or a topic that fascinates him and he's fully dialled in, but when he has to cover something like Wimbledon he'll just trot out dated information and a few bits of cheap innuendo.

I can sort of understand based on your contributions on here why he paid no attention to what you were saying.

Paul Ross on the other hand is the worst Ross you could inflict on the airwaves - below even Bob or Kemp.
Come for the rampant misogyny, stay for the tedious bitching

User avatar
Erskine Might
Registered user
Posts: 2237
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:17 pm

Re: Paul M Cat Ross

Post by Erskine Might »

Lou Grant wrote: I love Kelner. If it's a subject he's interested in or a guest that has something interesting to say then he's brilliant, but he never fakes it for stuff he couldn't give a toss about. Same for his slot on H&J ... get him on a sport he loves or a topic that fascinates him and he's fully dialled in, but when he has to cover something like Wimbledon he'll just trot out dated information and a few bits of cheap innuendo.

I can sort of understand based on your contributions on here why he paid no attention to what you were saying.

Paul Ross on the other hand is the worst Ross you could inflict on the airwaves - below even Bob or Kemp.


Charming. Actually he's used my book innumerable times since, once he bothered to read it, and it's on one of his professed favourite subjects. So quite frankly, if you want to do PR for him, fine, but your presumptuousness here, along with your usual pretensions to apodictic wisdom, are a step too far. You're on ignore; I suggest to you do the same.

Post Reply