The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

In-depth debate on all topical issues
Post Reply
User avatar
m4rkb
Registered user
Posts: 11315
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Ape City

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by m4rkb »

Does 'it won't happen in our lifetime' mean it surely will but not for a while yet?
If so, it's a shame the advocates don't care about the kind of world we leave behind for our grand kids in the same way they are protesting the same sentiment over climate change.

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34351
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Carlos J »

Indeed, Roy. It won't happen in your nor my lifetimes. But, m4rk, I am left wing and chilled and happy to have a debate. As are some on here. We may have have different opinions on some, hey, we are not socialist sheep.

Especially regarding Islam, which as any common sense person knows, has it's share of nutters, more so than Johnny Jesus? Yeah, look at where wars have been fought. You got attacked, you will attack back, not hard.

If Lanka is a Muslim attack, then it will show the total disparity of the socalled "worldwide jihadist mentality". As because Lanka is trying to sort ot itself out from years v Tamils, a minority Muslim population will get fucked sadly after this. Great for the worldwide cause, some fucker in and out or dead and the rest of the population has too reap.

Tourism, nah, a short down turn and then same again as Lanka lovely. Johnny Islam, if him, has hasn't done himself much good politcally or economically.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
m4rkb
Registered user
Posts: 11315
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Ape City

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by m4rkb »

Carlos J wrote:Indeed, Roy. It won't happen in your nor my lifetimes. But, m4rk, I am left wing and chilled and happy to have a debate. As are some on here*. We may have have different opinions on some, hey, we are not socialist sheep.

Especially regarding Islam, which as any common sense person knows, has it's share of nutters, more so than Johnny Jesus? Yeah, look at where wars have been fought. You got attacked, you will attack back, not hard.

IfLanka is a Muslim attack, then it will show the total disparity of the socalled "worldwide jihadist mentality". As because Lanka is trying to sort ot itself out from years v Tamils, a minority Muslim population will get fucked sadly after this. Great for the worldwide cause, some fucker in and out or dead and the rest of the population has too reap.

Tourism, nah, a short down turn and then same again as Lanka lovely. Johnny Islam, if him, has hasn't done himself much good politcally or economically.


Yes I know you are left wing and chilled Carlos. I also know you are quite well balanced to so don't pick and chose which subjects to go into plain denial mode or even chose to jump to any conclusions at all. You've got remarkably consistent form for it too. I've asked you in the past for your wild guess about what happened to Maddie or some mysterious air crash but you never commit. That is certainly not criticism from me , in fact I commend it for services to impartiality rather than blind stupidity. It's also one reason I can't ever remember getting into an argument on here with you and calling you a blinkered leftie . Who the other open debaters are though from the left remains somewhat of a mystery but rest assured any mud is not aimed at you. The majority seem to be deliberately blind on PC grounds.

Many are one step away from liking the idea of ISIS fighters coming back to the UK because it resembles Labours spiteful notion of rubbing the right's nose in diversity.

Frankly it is not possible to debate with these people at all so I might as well just throw rotten fruit at them instead - metaphorically of course. Mark that one down for future reference in the modshack :wink:

Back to Lanka as you put it.

You are of course right again about the history of the place and what troubles they faced in the past and from whom. But that does not stop dedicated madmen motivated by twisted versions of religion. The Caliphate includes everywhere BTW even Sri Lanka. And it's a church on a notable religious day for Christians. Plus these madmen don't actually care about muslims. As far as they are concerned they aren't muslims for not subscribing to their beliefs so are no better than any other Kuffa.

I won't mention false flags and stuff as a means to stir things up but the suspect looks rather mallard looking, has a similar gait and is making loud quacking noises.

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34351
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Carlos J »

m4rkb wrote:
Carlos J wrote:Indeed, Roy. It won't happen in your nor my lifetimes. But, m4rk, I am left wing and chilled and happy to have a debate. As are some on here*. We may have have different opinions on some, hey, we are not socialist sheep.

Especially regarding Islam, which as any common sense person knows, has it's share of nutters, more so than Johnny Jesus? Yeah, look at where wars have been fought. You got attacked, you will attack back, not hard.

IfLanka is a Muslim attack, then it will show the total disparity of the socalled "worldwide jihadist mentality". As because Lanka is trying to sort ot itself out from years v Tamils, a minority Muslim population will get fucked sadly after this. Great for the worldwide cause, some fucker in and out or dead and the rest of the population has too reap.

Tourism, nah, a short down turn and then same again as Lanka lovely. Johnny Islam, if him, has hasn't done himself much good politcally or economically.


Yes I know you are left wing and chilled Carlos. I also know you are quite well balanced to so don't pick and chose which subjects to go into plain denial mode or even chose to jump to any conclusions at all. You've got remarkably consistent form for it too. I've asked you in the past for your wild guess about what happened to Maddie or some mysterious air crash but you never commit. That is certainly not criticism from me , in fact I commend it for services to impartiality rather than blind stupidity. It's also one reason I can't ever remember getting into an argument on here with you and calling you a blinkered leftie . Who the other open debaters are though from the left remains somewhat of a mystery but rest assured any mud is not aimed at you. The majority seem to be deliberately blind on PC grounds.

Many are one step away from liking the idea of ISIS fighters coming back to the UK because it resembles Labours spiteful notion of rubbing the right's nose in diversity.

Frankly it is not possible to debate with these people at all so I might as well just throw rotten fruit at them instead - metaphorically of course. Mark that one down for future reference in the modshack :wink:

Back to Lanka as you put it.

You are of course right again about the history of the place and what troubles they faced in the past and from whom. But that does not stop dedicated madmen motivated by twisted versions of religion. The Caliphate includes everywhere BTW even Sri Lanka. And it's a church on a notable religious day for Christians. Plus these madmen don't actually care about muslims. As far as they are concerned they aren't muslims for not subscribing to their beliefs so are no better than any other Kuffa.

I won't mention false flags and stuff as a means to stir things up but the suspect looks rather mallard looking, has a similar gait and is making loud quacking noises.

Kind words old friend and thank you. You are an err good debater. :) I do hope but fear that it is some twats for Islam. As per, the people who will be hurt are the good Muslims in Sri Lanka.

Yeah great, you're a minority already in the your country. Kill a couple of hundred, get killed or away as your fellow people get repressed for years ahead.

Fucking stupid. Yeah, I know it has gone on that way for years, but this is 2019. There are way better neans to achieve a "worldwide jihadist mentality", than leaving your own to get fucked. It is just so idiotic for many reasons,
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Holden Mcgroyne
Registered user
Posts: 10233
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 2:13 pm

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Holden Mcgroyne »

Sri Lanka must be regretting its imperialist foreign policy and interference in the Middle East.
There's no poem, just prose.

User avatar
Royal24s
Registered user
Posts: 9081
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:42 am

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Royal24s »

Carlos J wrote:Indeed, Roy. It won't happen in your nor my lifetimes. But, m4rk, I am left wing and chilled and happy to have a debate. As are some on here. We may have have different opinions on some, hey, we are not socialist sheep.

Especially regarding Islam, which as any common sense person knows, has it's share of nutters, more so than Johnny Jesus? Yeah, look at where wars have been fought. You got attacked, you will attack back, not hard.

If Lanka is a Muslim attack, then it will show the total disparity of the socalled "worldwide jihadist mentality". As because Lanka is trying to sort ot itself out from years v Tamils, a minority Muslim population will get fucked sadly after this. Great for the worldwide cause, some fucker in and out or dead and the rest of the population has too reap.

Tourism, nah, a short down turn and then same again as Lanka lovely. Johnny Islam, if him, has hasn't done himself much good politcally or economically.



Off topic really, but I'm surprised you're left wing. You seem far too intelligent and pleasant for that, although I once knew an nice and intelligent socialist who, when I think about it ,was also from Middlesborough.
You don't share the Christian names of Satre do you ? Wouldn't that be a coincidence if you were the same person ?
Seems unlikely , but it seems odd if there are two intelligent socialists ,especially from the same place .
'"Beauty is truth, truth beauty,
That is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know".

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34351
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Carlos J »

Not me, Royals. I only lived in Boro as a child. But kind words and thank you.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Royal24s
Registered user
Posts: 9081
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:42 am

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Royal24s »

Thought not, but I had to ask.
'"Beauty is truth, truth beauty,
That is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know".

User avatar
shivah
Registered user
Posts: 18793
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 7:13 pm
Contact:

The Religion of Peace

Post by shivah »

Grunt is a Chunt.

User avatar
m4rkb
Registered user
Posts: 11315
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Ape City

Re: The Religion of Peace

Post by m4rkb »

Wasn't one of these brave cops sent on a mandatory de-radicalisation course just in case the experience of dealing with these cunts led to him not being as in love with Islam as he should be?

User avatar
Hillman avenger
Registered user
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: north and south

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Hillman avenger »

Why would a cop be sent on a de-radicalisation course?
Listen to Talksport and let it be a lesson to you

User avatar
Vespa
Registered user
Posts: 19949
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:37 am

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Vespa »

Hillman avenger wrote:Why would a cop be sent on a de-radicalisation course?


He was riding his motorbike too radically man.

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Roy Twing »

By way of a break from the pointless brexit debates, - here's something for the usual suspects to either ignore or defile:
As per usual on a sunday breakfast, I've just read peter hitchens' sunday column, https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/ and as per usual, his main soapbox these days is his crusade against drugs, - good for him, if that's his thing, but it doesn't interest me.
He did also though, mention something about an insidious plot to undermine press freedom of speech on the subject of islam and muslims, such that would prevent or restrict criticism of that cult and its followers.
It turns out that he was referring to a report by policy exchange https://policyexchange.org.uk/wp-conten ... -press.pdf which highlights the fact that the press 'watchdog' has been/is suggesting that the 'religion' should be treated differently from other religions, in that criticism of it 'should be rooted in racism'.
The very same mindset that some on here have demonstrated more and more of late.
I must admit that I have noticed an absence of reports (waits for the obvious response) concerning the previously ubiquitous examples of 'incompatibility', - wonder if it's connected.
Anyway, it seems that this influence over the press is orchestrated by one individual - Miqdaad Versi, - never heard of him before, but will be doing some reading.

Another comment here: https://www.spectator.co.uk/2019/09/rev ... amophobia/
Anyone (such as Tick) that uses 'gammon' as a racial pejorative is as much a racist as those who use the word nigger and similar pejoratively.
E & OE

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Roy Twing »

I know no-one wants to engage on this topic because they want to conveniently and comfortably ignore this thread as the rantings of a racist or bigot, but despite the best efforts of your like-minded thought police in the media and such, the disgusting crimes of on street grooming gangs continue apace.
Enjoy the comfort of those blinkers as long as you can.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9900282/g ... rls-abuse/

Oh, and before the usual suspects point out that the likes of the bbc did in fact report the above story, - they did so on local news rather than national, because it clearly wasn't as important as some emmerdale actor getting sacked.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-49650537
Anyone (such as Tick) that uses 'gammon' as a racial pejorative is as much a racist as those who use the word nigger and similar pejoratively.
E & OE

User avatar
Zambo
Registered user
Posts: 25747
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:18 am
Location: VAR office

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Post by Zambo »

I'm afraid this will be the response.

Image
When your heart is blue, there is nothing you can do. Keep Right On

Post Reply