Zambo wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:As with the BBC argument, "biased" means "doesn't agree with me"
Parliament has been trying to do its job re Brexit, which is to get an outcome which it judges to be best for the people who elected them.
Johnson has tired to by-pass that because his arguments are so weak and would be, and are, demolished.
Bercow stood up for the process.
If you think that's bias, tough.
The election is the result for Johnson- a totally unsuitable way of resolving the issue, rather than behave like a democrat an ddeal with it.
You are taking the exact opposite view. You think he's impartial because you agree with him, despite overwhelming evidence, just like you don't think the BBC is biased because you are as left as they are. And they fail miserably to defend their position just like you do.
Indeed, - the unique thing about these two examples (Bercow & the bbc) is that they are specifically required to be unbiased.
If they did happen to be biased in favour of topics I agree with though, I would be pleased, given the amount of influence they have, but I wouldn't try to pretend that they aren't in fact biased. That would be just hypocritical and disingenuous.