Hillman avenger wrote:m4rkb wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:m4rkb wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:m4rkb wrote:You really do live a complete bubble don't you.
The recent news stories about youtuber Count Dankula, the banning of two women journalists from entering Britain and the continued assault on moderate right wing opinion being re-classified as hate crime has obviously escaped you. Like everything else, if it wasn't on the BBC it doesn't exist in your insanely blinkered world.
Don't make the many mistakes you have here.
I am no more "in a bubble " than you.
I don't only listen to the BBC. I use others. Whereas you and others who reject the BBC end up as misinformed as you show.
What you regard as the current headlines is laughable.
Not really bothered either way about the women being denied entry. There are probably good reasons. After all, we are quite well supplied with ignorant bigots, so I'm not sure it's much loss.
Trump is unravelling before your eyes and you think this is important.
Trump is not 'unravelling before our eyes' unless you belong to one of those obsessive groups who think he is and intake nothing but their propaganda. The BBC is one.
Maybe Trump is the reason the BBC failed to reported on the Shropshire abuse scandal too because other news was more important?
They did report on it.
Lastly are you comfortable with draconian terrorism laws being used to keep out people who are clearly not terrorists while ,as has been reported on every network bar the BBC that we have allowed - sorry welcomed, over 400 active jihadists back into the country?
That was reported too. The difference is that those 400 are UK citizens and have a right of entry. If they have committed offences under UK law they can then be arrested.
Clearly you aren't.
There is a clear pattern now of the BBC ignoring stories which call into question the multicultural utopia we apparently live in, and them suddenly appearing days later when people question why the BBC has not reported on them before or at the beginning.
Your defence towards welcoming back over 400 Jihadis who could not state their hatred of Britain and the West any louder is pitiful.
Who talked about "welcoming back" the Jihadis? I didn't.I said they have UK passports, which allow them entry. If they have done sstuff abroad which breaks UK law, they should then be arrested. You don't seem to understand we have laws about these things.
They may have a right to entry but it's similar to the right of entry of a pupil to a school when his intention is to unload an assault rifle on his classmates.
Some people can see these problems as they form and others (you and your leftist cohorts) cannot.
So what part of that represents any actually action towards solving the problem? On the face of it , and in reality , nothing meaningful was done. They were allowed back uncontested. Meanwhile a set of draconian laws were abused to prevent the entry of two young ladies who had no criminal record or association with terrorists groups, other than the usual labels applied by hard left pressure groups.
) I would have thought you'd appreciate RLJ's success in the industry. He earns close to £1m a year for a reason. 
