BBC Bias - Part 2

In-depth debate on all topical issues
Post Reply
User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Roy Twing »

A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html
Anyone (such as Tick) that uses 'gammon' as a racial pejorative is as much a racist as those who use the word nigger and similar pejoratively.
E & OE

User avatar
LordLaret
Registered user
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:37 pm
Contact:

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by LordLaret »

m4rkb wrote:They haven't reported on the three recent bans into the UK by three conservative commentators either bearing in mind it's one of the biggest stories of the day. Naturally the mainstream media describe them all as 'far right' as all even 'small c' conservatives are now described in this way.
The three in question are Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone and her boyfriend Martin Sellner who were prevented entry to the UK under terrorist legislation.

May I remind you this is a conservative government which has done this but we all know they are leftist liberals

Here's a picture of these two female far right terrorists.
Image

Meanwhile, the UK government has let back into the UK over 400 ISIS fighters and lavished them with prizes to integrate them back into British society, not to mention a whole host of other Islamic extremists they have willingly let in.

We are watching a concerted assault on moderate right wing values here being described as extremism just so they can silence their own impotence over proper terrorism rather than admit it's out of control.

There's lots of commentary on this on the internet at present, but I'll give you the first part of PJWs sarcastic take on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45n1CSetiM


This is what scares me. They banned these two, how long before they start knocking on the doors of those with slight right wing leanings? Have the Left gone completely mad or something about not wanting to have open and frank debates about the state the world is in?
"My Profile Signatures Were Crap, So I Got Rid Of Them."

User avatar
m4rkb
Registered user
Posts: 11315
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Ape City

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by m4rkb »

LordLaret wrote:
m4rkb wrote:They haven't reported on the three recent bans into the UK by three conservative commentators either bearing in mind it's one of the biggest stories of the day. Naturally the mainstream media describe them all as 'far right' as all even 'small c' conservatives are now described in this way.
The three in question are Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone and her boyfriend Martin Sellner who were prevented entry to the UK under terrorist legislation.

May I remind you this is a conservative government which has done this but we all know they are leftist liberals

Here's a picture of these two female far right terrorists.
Image

Meanwhile, the UK government has let back into the UK over 400 ISIS fighters and lavished them with prizes to integrate them back into British society, not to mention a whole host of other Islamic extremists they have willingly let in.

We are watching a concerted assault on moderate right wing values here being described as extremism just so they can silence their own impotence over proper terrorism rather than admit it's out of control.

There's lots of commentary on this on the internet at present, but I'll give you the first part of PJWs sarcastic take on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45n1CSetiM


This is what scares me. They banned these two, how long before they start knocking on the doors of those with slight right wing leanings? Have the Left gone completely mad or something about not wanting to have open and frank debates about the state the world is in?


They're not even waiting for that. Youtuber Count Dankula was today convicted of hate crime for making his dog do a nazi salute as a joke.

The ultra liberal agenda has been such a dismal failure in gaining the support of normal people they are now literally having to enforce it by authoritarian jackboot methods.

Anyone remotely concerned about the consequences of anything they push on us is now convicted - rather than previously just accused , of hate crime.

Hate crime is just another form of terrorism if you think about it, so that will be the next step unless we grow the balls enough to stop it.

User avatar
LordLaret
Registered user
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:37 pm
Contact:

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by LordLaret »

m4rkb wrote:
LordLaret wrote:
m4rkb wrote:They haven't reported on the three recent bans into the UK by three conservative commentators either bearing in mind it's one of the biggest stories of the day. Naturally the mainstream media describe them all as 'far right' as all even 'small c' conservatives are now described in this way.
The three in question are Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone and her boyfriend Martin Sellner who were prevented entry to the UK under terrorist legislation.

May I remind you this is a conservative government which has done this but we all know they are leftist liberals

Here's a picture of these two female far right terrorists.
Image

Meanwhile, the UK government has let back into the UK over 400 ISIS fighters and lavished them with prizes to integrate them back into British society, not to mention a whole host of other Islamic extremists they have willingly let in.

We are watching a concerted assault on moderate right wing values here being described as extremism just so they can silence their own impotence over proper terrorism rather than admit it's out of control.

There's lots of commentary on this on the internet at present, but I'll give you the first part of PJWs sarcastic take on it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45n1CSetiM


This is what scares me. They banned these two, how long before they start knocking on the doors of those with slight right wing leanings? Have the Left gone completely mad or something about not wanting to have open and frank debates about the state the world is in?


They're not even waiting for that. Youtuber Count Dankula was today convicted of hate crime for making his dog do a nazi salute as a joke.

The ultra liberal agenda has been such a dismal failure in gaining the support of normal people they are now literally having to enforce it by authoritarian jackboot methods.

Anyone remotely concerned about the consequences of anything they push on us is now convicted - rather than previously just accused , of hate crime.

Hate crime is just another form of terrorism if you think about it, so that will be the next step unless we grow the balls enough to stop it.


I was going to make a seperate topic about Count Dankula since I follow it via the Kotaku Reddit (I am a Pro GamerGater) but I'd probably bee shot down in flames for admitting such.
"My Profile Signatures Were Crap, So I Got Rid Of Them."

User avatar
Darkyboy
Registered user
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Great Britain not Rubbish Britain

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Darkyboy »

Appalling state of affairs, when a man talking nonsense to a dog is a crime. It's worth noting that the sheriff used the word offensive a number of times, to justify the verdict.

"In my view it is a reasonable conclusion that the video is grossly offensive"

"The accused knew that the material was offensive and knew why it was offensive."

"Despite that the accused made a video containing anti-Semitic content and he would have known it was grossly offensive to many Jewish people."

Perhaps those that say freedom is speech is alive and well, might like to take the blinkers off.
Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty, we are free at last.

User avatar
m4rkb
Registered user
Posts: 11315
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Ape City

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by m4rkb »

Darkyboy wrote:Appalling state of affairs, when a man talking nonsense to a dog is a crime. It's worth noting that the sheriff used the word offensive a number of times, to justify the verdict.

"In my view it is a reasonable conclusion that the video is grossly offensive"

"The accused knew that the material was offensive and knew why it was offensive."

"Despite that the accused made a video containing anti-Semitic content and he would have known it was grossly offensive to many Jewish people."

Perhaps those that say freedom is speech is alive and well, might like to take the blinkers off.



I get the impression the verdicts these 'courts' are reaching -and the judges presiding over them, are somewhat under duress from twitter mobs and other forms of prominent political movements rather than the actual letter of the law.

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Eaststand »

Whats lost on people a lot nowadays is the definition of freedom of speech isnt and has never been, to say exactly as you want.

Take Jon Gaunt, for instance. He completely misunderstands free speech and is outraged he cant be massively racist, and the fact he cant be massively racist is an infringement of his civil liberties. No its not. The idea of freedom of speech is that your voice is equal to any one elses, no matter your stature, not "I should be allowed to spout whatever hatred I want" It was never about that, its about having a voice. This has been horribly twisted recently. You can't and have never been able to say exactly what you want.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
Kowalski
Registered user
Posts: 1680
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:57 pm

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Kowalski »

That pug video was an obvious poor attempt at humour, he was comparing a dog to Hitler for god's sake.

This country is warped.

User avatar
subsub
Registered user
Posts: 21971
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Herts

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by subsub »

Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html

Sharing Richard Littlejohn articles and expecting people to take you seriously…
:rolleyes:
WOKE AND PROUD

User avatar
Bad Blue 2000
Registered user
Posts: 5453
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:05 pm
Location: The BantCave

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Bad Blue 2000 »

I've been left-wing all my life, always voted Labour and perceived the Tories as the enemy.

Nowaday's though, the Left are doing all the PR work for the Right-Wing.

It's genuinely embarrassing how the Left behave.
I HEAR YOU KNOCKIN', BUT YOU CAN'T COME IN...

User avatar
Holden Mcgroyne
Registered user
Posts: 10235
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 2:13 pm

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Holden Mcgroyne »

Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html


Magnificent tour de force by Richie L. Will be deliberately not read but still vilified by those with closed minds.
There's no poem, just prose.

User avatar
Steve Hunt
Winner POTY - 2010 !!!!
Posts: 12535
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:57 am
Location: The Effiminates Stadium,London, N7

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Steve Hunt »

Bad Blue 2000 wrote:I've been left-wing all my life, always voted Labour and perceived the Tories as the enemy.

Nowaday's though, the Left are doing all the PR work for the Right-Wing.

It's genuinely embarrassing how the Left behave.


Not just the left, Blue

All of them.

Politics in the UK has never been at a lower point, imo.

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Roy Twing »

subsub wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html

Sharing Richard Littlejohn articles and expecting people to take you seriously…
:rolleyes:


'Seriously'? what part of 'lighthearted' didn't you understand? :roll: :roll:
Anyone (such as Tick) that uses 'gammon' as a racial pejorative is as much a racist as those who use the word nigger and similar pejoratively.
E & OE

User avatar
subsub
Registered user
Posts: 21971
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 9:02 am
Location: Herts

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by subsub »

Roy Twing wrote:
subsub wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html

Sharing Richard Littlejohn articles and expecting people to take you seriously…
:rolleyes:


'Seriously'? what part of 'lighthearted' didn't you understand? :roll: :roll:

Then why share the link, if you don't want others to read it? :roll: :roll:
WOKE AND PROUD

User avatar
Roy Twing
Registered user
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:20 pm
Location: 51 23 46 N 0 11 56 W

Re: BBC Bias - Part 2

Post by Roy Twing »

subsub wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:
subsub wrote:
Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html

Sharing Richard Littlejohn articles and expecting people to take you seriously…
:rolleyes:


'Seriously'? what part of 'lighthearted' didn't you understand? :roll: :roll:

Then why share the link, if you don't want others to read it? :roll: :roll:


Where did I say I didn't want others to read it?
My god, you're on even worse form than usual today, - keep on posting. :wink: :wink:
Anyone (such as Tick) that uses 'gammon' as a racial pejorative is as much a racist as those who use the word nigger and similar pejoratively.
E & OE

Post Reply