Gregory Follis wrote:Vespa wrote:Gregory Follis wrote:Sorry haven't got the time to go back and link them, but they are easy to look up. You could do a search along the lines of 'how the BBC stood by and allowed Savile to go unchecked' or similar.
Not a problem, I bow to your obvious detailed analysis of the report you can't remember the name of.
They were newspaper headlines, not reports, but I'm sure there are reports mentioned in the body of the articles. Look them up if you can be arsed, or don't if you can't, but either way there is no need to bow.
correct, it was the Dame Janet Smith Report. Linking a BBC article about it because its kind of funny.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35658398
"BBC Trust chairwoman Rona Fairhead said the corporation had "turned a blind eye, where it should have shone a light".
Ted Beston, Savile's Radio 1 producer, acted as a "provider" of young women for Savile at least once, and "must have realised" some of the girls were under-age - although he denies this - and should have reported it.
Douglas Muggeridge, late controller of Radio 1 and 2 in 1973, launched two investigations into Savile in 1973 but the inquiries were more concerned with "risk of damage to the BBC's reputation" than the welfare of the girls who might be involved with Savile.
Dirty, filthy, fucking cunts, absolutely no chance I would EVER pay the licence fee ever again, despicable revolting organisation which should be wiped off the planet.
)