Owen Jones kicked in the head

[Roy Twing]

Don't know about anyone else, but my scepticism wasn't whether or not he was attacked (not exactly a difficult scenario to imagine to be honest) but the fact that he immediately and continually blamed the 'far right'.
That remains my interest in this case.

*REVERSING*

Reversing?
You're on a roll today aren't you?

This was one of my few comments on this thread (I preferred my 'blue oyster bar' link though - always makes me chuckle) from a couple of weeks ago :

"Could be wrong, but I think the main question is whether it was a 'politically motivated attack by right wing extremists' as claimed, or not".

In the words of hillman, - please tell us from what I am reversing?

My apologies, Roy, it was your partner in crime, m4rk.
It is quite tricky to tell one from the other, though.

I feel I've been damned with a faint apology, but I'll take it.

[m4rkb]

Don't know about anyone else, but my scepticism wasn't whether or not he was attacked (not exactly a difficult scenario to imagine to be honest) but the fact that he immediately and continually blamed the 'far right'.
That remains my interest in this case.

*REVERSING*

Reversing?
You're on a roll today aren't you?

This was one of my few comments on this thread (I preferred my 'blue oyster bar' link though - always makes me chuckle) from a couple of weeks ago :

"Could be wrong, but I think the main question is whether it was a 'politically motivated attack by right wing extremists' as claimed, or not".

In the words of hillman, - please tell us from what I am reversing?

My apologies, Roy, it was your partner in crime, m4rk.
It is quite tricky to tell one from the other, though.

I do like to make my opinions clear so it takes someone particularly dim not understand what I'm saying. Or more frequently these days, people living in a left wing dream world who imagine something else is being said when it's not.

Here's a precis of my views.

Jones is a petulant left wing goading squirt who probably knows there's good value having a gob on him just asking to be closed.
The rest is him bullshitting and using his wordy skills to paint a distorted and heavily politicised version of events.

No decent assault worth it's name took place.

[subsub]

Don't know about anyone else, but my scepticism wasn't whether or not he was attacked (not exactly a difficult scenario to imagine to be honest) but the fact that he immediately and continually blamed the 'far right'.
That remains my interest in this case.

*REVERSING*

Reversing?
You're on a roll today aren't you?

This was one of my few comments on this thread (I preferred my 'blue oyster bar' link though - always makes me chuckle) from a couple of weeks ago :

"Could be wrong, but I think the main question is whether it was a 'politically motivated attack by right wing extremists' as claimed, or not".

In the words of hillman, - please tell us from what I am reversing?

My apologies, Roy, it was your partner in crime, m4rk.
It is quite tricky to tell one from the other, though.

I feel I've been damned with a faint apology, but I'll take it.

Not at all, Roy.
I misrepresented you; I apologise.

[subsub]

No decent assault worth it's name took place.

How can you possibly know that?
Were you there?

[m4rkb]

No decent assault worth it's name took place.

How can you possibly know that?
Were you there?

I wish I had been. There would definitely have been an assault worth its name.

[joke]

[Roy Twing]

Don't know about anyone else, but my scepticism wasn't whether or not he was attacked (not exactly a difficult scenario to imagine to be honest) but the fact that he immediately and continually blamed the 'far right'.
That remains my interest in this case.

*REVERSING*

Reversing?
You're on a roll today aren't you?

This was one of my few comments on this thread (I preferred my 'blue oyster bar' link though - always makes me chuckle) from a couple of weeks ago :

"Could be wrong, but I think the main question is whether it was a 'politically motivated attack by right wing extremists' as claimed, or not".

In the words of hillman, - please tell us from what I am reversing?

My apologies, Roy, it was your partner in crime, m4rk.
It is quite tricky to tell one from the other, though.

I feel I've been damned with a faint apology, but I'll take it.

Not at all, Roy.
I misrepresented you; I apologise.

No problem - I meant to put a at the end of my post to show that it was tongue in cheek.
Apology fully and unconditionally accepted, and many thanks.

[m4rkb]

[subsub]

[m4rkb]

FFS - Just heard this on the news. The story must be massive.

[Shedboy]

FFS - Just heard this on the news. The story must be massive.

As massive as the extent of his injuries?

If they're found guilty they should be given the appropriate jail time, or be forced to sit through a couple of minutes of Jones' tv interviews.
I think they'd choose doing time.

[Holden Mcgroyne]

Any CCTV yet ?

Some people more willing to give Ben Stokes the benefit of the doubt when his victim was knocked unconscious than the alleged perpetrators of the scratch inflicted on Mr Jones by the right wing paramilitaries.

[AlcoholBrazil]

Ahh but Owen Jones has never won a World Cup .

[Desolation]

https://mikesplace2017.wordpress.com/20 ... fflcition/

A great read. I put this here as Jones is most certainly afflicted as are most of the lefties on here..fucking mad bastards!

[kancutlawns]

Don't know about anyone else, but my scepticism wasn't whether or not he was attacked (not exactly a difficult scenario to imagine to be honest) but the fact that he immediately and continually blamed the 'far right'.
That remains my interest in this case.

*REVERSING*

Reversing?
You're on a roll today aren't you?

This was one of my few comments on this thread (I preferred my 'blue oyster bar' link though - always makes me chuckle) from a couple of weeks ago :

"Could be wrong, but I think the main question is whether it was a 'politically motivated attack by right wing extremists' as claimed, or not".

In the words of hillman, - please tell us from what I am reversing?

My apologies, Roy, it was your partner in crime, m4rk.
It is quite tricky to tell one from the other, though.

I do like to make my opinions clear so it takes someone particularly dim not understand what I'm saying. Or more frequently these days, people living in a left wing dream world who imagine something else is being said when it's not.

Here's a precis of my views.

Jones is a petulant left wing goading squirt who probably knows there's good value having a gob on him just asking to be closed.
The rest is him bullshitting and using his wordy skills to paint a distorted and heavily politicised version of events.

No decent assault worth it's name took place.

I come across virtually nothing about Jones. I’m sure you can like me avoid him if you choose to, it’s easily done unless you seek him out so you can get on your soapbox about him goading you and being a component of a loony left wing liberal plot to specifically upset you. A precise of your views are those that have been comprehensively debunked many times over.

I know that Littlejohn, Liddle and Hitchens are right wing, reactionary cunts triggering the little people and who take the penny for their own fatuous needs. I don’t need to seek out their opinions though as I really do dislike them.

If you don’t like him, stop bloody well listening and reading him. It ain’t hard.

[Roy Twing]

https://mikesplace2017.wordpress.com/20 ... fflcition/

A great read. I put this here as Jones is most certainly afflicted as are most of the lefties on here..fucking mad bastards!

A great read indeed, - deserves its own thread in my opinion (particularly as it might divert the Jones thread, & I'm eagerly awaiting the 'far right' being convicted, as per his accusations), - let the lefties analyse themselves.
It packed a lot into a few paragraphs.
The thought of comparing the legacies of Churchill & Hitler, had they both died in 1938, as with the alternative, (what if we had lost the war) is worth pondering as well.
The final paragraph, to all the hand-wringing 'white liberals' is one I'd like to hear their thoughts (not sure why australia & NZ were omitted though):

"To those who suggest that the modern West is blighted by racism, misogyny and religious hatred I would simply ask, to what are you comparing this society? Name a single society, today or in the past, that is as free and equal as the modern Europe or North America. I can wait."