Roy Twing wrote:subsub wrote:Ralph wrote:subsub wrote:m4rkb wrote:subsub wrote:m4rkb wrote:Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.
I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.
By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!
Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!
The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.
No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.
But we were already in the EU so that's hardly the same thing.
So we would have stayed the same anyway.
Would Brexiter politicians have 'accepted the result' if they’d lost. Of course not.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m-36306681
Exactly.
Difference being though, is that if 'remain' won, - they'd have instantly been rewarded with the spoils of their victory, - we've waited more than 3 years without.
Well, we would have just got on with more important things. Nobody gave a shit about the EU 10 years ago.