Hillman avenger wrote:paolo wrote:Where’s hillmainds in this here Fred?
Disappointing as it is, your pomme frites are due for a dose of urine.
Mind, the quality of Tory spoiling tactics, in this election has been staggeringly low.
But to be clear
Even if the original source of the information is Russian, do you not think the electorate needs to know this? The real issue is, is it true? An old-fashioned concept I know, but more important that voters should know what this bunch of liars, cheats and thieves are about..
But in context, let's get concerned when THIRTEEN separate state agencies identify interference; when they are caught directly tampering with the voting system; when somebody who works for Corbyn is found guilty of colluding with them...when another of his team has lunch with them before they try to flee the country, when we find he is dependent on their money...when Corbyn wins a world award for ineptitude by saying "It wasn't the Russians, it was the Ukrainians"...
Interesting isn't it how the report on Russian interference in the 2016 vote is unavailable. Although Johnson tells us there's nothing to be concerned about . Yeah.
It's a very 1970s idea to think Russia wants to support the British left. They gave up on that thirty years ago. Their game now is to encourage the right-wing nationalists who want to dissolve the western alliances. It is directly opposite to their interests to do anything which would threaten Johnson's path to authority.
And God help us.
quite good for you, my scouse
with corbyn having led the labour party for some time, against the inept, useless back stabbing tories (so beloved of raplhie), and seemingly (unless he pulls a trump or a brexist) with no chance to win, why is he still their leader?....
they could have gone to a tory like blair, that kind of figure or at least got some party unity....the tories are there for the taking
is he that selfish that he puts himself before the people?
tbf, he barebacked abbott multiple times