Ralph wrote:m4rkb wrote:subsub wrote:Roy Twing wrote:subsub wrote:Roy Twing wrote:A lighthearted take on the lunacy that has infested us - not specifically targeting the bbc, but if the cap fits (and it certainly does):
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... enses.html
Sharing Richard Littlejohn articles and expecting people to take you seriously…
'Seriously'? what part of 'lighthearted' didn't you understand?
Then why share the link, if you don't want others to read it?
As a journalist yourself ( ) I would have thought you'd appreciate RLJ's success in the industry. He earns close to £1m a year for a reason.
But as far as the article is concerned , the one you won't read but somehow you know is all made up bullshit, which paragraph is not correct?
Not hard for an experienced sub editor like yourself.
He writes what the billionaire press barons who pay his £1 million a year want him to.
No he doesn't, he has his own niche which is commenting on the utter stupidity we see in public life. If you read the article which you clearly haven't and also clearly don't intend to you'd see his swipes were:
1) Feminists gatecrashing a men only swimming session by self identifying as men which the staff let by lest they be accused of transphobia
2) A paragraph about how hospitals have stopped using the word 'mother' in maternity wards.
3) A comment about gender neutral Mother's Day cards.
4) Gender neutral toilets in a girls school with no transgenders
5) A swipe about PE in schools being racist as it's steeped in white supremacy and colonialism
6) An asylum seeker who specifically stated his hatred for Britain who then went on to attempt to murder as many people as possible being lavished with our hospitality and money while no one (on the left) saw a potential threat.
7) The stupidity of ordering an aircraft carrier with no planes to put on it
Several government departments turning a blind eye to mass rape of children because it might be racist to point it out.
That's virtually a concise list of points RLJ raised you had no idea about because you never read the articles so have no idea what you're talking about.
So, to you and SubSub, precisely which of those points and issues do you support and not find utterly ridiculous?
After all Littlejohn is just a bigot isn't he?