Group C: Peru V Denmark

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Eaststand »

Yeah that is youll never walk alone.

I wonder why.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
Two Crows
Registered user
Posts: 1338
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:05 am
Location: Ireland

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Two Crows »

Unlucky Peru.
Dieu Le Roi.

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34388
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Carlos J »

Eaststand wrote:Yeah that is youll never walk alone.

I wonder why.

:smt023
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34388
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Carlos J »

Two Crows wrote:Unlucky Peru.

Plucky Peru.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Bad Blue 2000
Registered user
Posts: 5453
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:05 pm
Location: The BantCave

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Bad Blue 2000 »

Does anybody else feel like smoking an Embassy Number 1?
I HEAR YOU KNOCKIN', BUT YOU CAN'T COME IN...

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by Eaststand »

Bad Blue 2000 wrote:Does anybody else feel like smoking an Embassy Number 1?

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
The End
Registered user
Posts: 8150
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 10:50 am
Location: Росси́я

Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark

Post by The End »

Eaststand wrote: Its quite clear I based everything on personal experience. Ive said I visited there


You didn't. You said your mate lived there.
Eaststand wrote: Do you want me to harrass you whenever you make a vague statement about russia? I dont get it.


This is discussion, not harrassment.
Eaststand wrote: There is reason why I didnt want to get into an in depth conversation with you, as they tend not to be the most rational conversations


Now we reach lazy abuse. Do go on...
Eaststand wrote: A few weeks ago I got called a prick and shouted at for calling someone who had failed a drugs test a cheat, for instance, so I just assumed this was going to be a nonsensical argument again.


That's not quite what happened, though, is it? Interesting, however, that you choose to reference a previous discussion utterly unrelated to this one.

I suggest you have a thin skin and cannot handle rational discussion. We're not all Del or Doug, you know - the ones on here with rational, coherent thought will call you out - or anyone out - when it seems fit. It's nowt personal from this side.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 250 character limit.

Post Reply