Yeah that is youll never walk alone.
I wonder why.
Group C: Peru V Denmark
- Eaststand
- Registered user
- Posts: 17966
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
- Location: having a smoochy smooch
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Build Back More Betterer
- Two Crows
- Registered user
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:05 am
- Location: Ireland
- Carlos J
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 34388
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
- Location: Searching for Celia.
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Eaststand wrote:Yeah that is youll never walk alone.
I wonder why.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.
Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
- Carlos J
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 34388
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
- Location: Searching for Celia.
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Two Crows wrote:Unlucky Peru.
Plucky Peru.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.
Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
- Bad Blue 2000
- Registered user
- Posts: 5453
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:05 pm
- Location: The BantCave
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Does anybody else feel like smoking an Embassy Number 1?
I HEAR YOU KNOCKIN', BUT YOU CAN'T COME IN...
- Eaststand
- Registered user
- Posts: 17966
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
- Location: having a smoochy smooch
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Bad Blue 2000 wrote:Does anybody else feel like smoking an Embassy Number 1?
Build Back More Betterer
- The End
- Registered user
- Posts: 8150
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 10:50 am
- Location: Росси́я
Re: Group C: Peru V Denmark
Eaststand wrote: Its quite clear I based everything on personal experience. Ive said I visited there
You didn't. You said your mate lived there.
Eaststand wrote: Do you want me to harrass you whenever you make a vague statement about russia? I dont get it.
This is discussion, not harrassment.
Eaststand wrote: There is reason why I didnt want to get into an in depth conversation with you, as they tend not to be the most rational conversations
Now we reach lazy abuse. Do go on...
Eaststand wrote: A few weeks ago I got called a prick and shouted at for calling someone who had failed a drugs test a cheat, for instance, so I just assumed this was going to be a nonsensical argument again.
That's not quite what happened, though, is it? Interesting, however, that you choose to reference a previous discussion utterly unrelated to this one.
I suggest you have a thin skin and cannot handle rational discussion. We're not all Del or Doug, you know - the ones on here with rational, coherent thought will call you out - or anyone out - when it seems fit. It's nowt personal from this side.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 250 character limit.