kancutlawns wrote:pugsly wrote:kancutlawns wrote:Pugs, they similarly to what Easty said were shit teams. I’d say that the Argentina side that won the 1986 World Cup were very average yet were lifted almost singlehandedly by one exceptional individual. You’ll have to explain to me why you think they were a very good team and yes your definition is somewhat different to mine.
I disagree with you saying that you’re nothing if you don’t win. I’ll tell you that people talk in more glowing terms about Brazil in 1982 than Italy who won under a cloud with match fixing allegations and only drew their three group matches.
Ok,The Argies got to the said Final , so they are worthy of there place, they then won, because they are the best team in the competition,
I didn't say [your nothing] if you don't win,you have been beaten by the better Team, that's all.
OK, that’s your opinion and I’m not challenging it further. We all have our own interpretation of what the “best team” is.
Ok Lawnsy goodnight cheers