Convicted and Imprisoned Stalker (Alex Bellenderfield)

[Vespa]

Keep defending him, it's an odd hill to die on..

[subsub]

He made a women's life miserable because the BBC sacked him, he gets what he deserves.

Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.

He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

[Vespa]

Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.

He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

I'm sure if Alex repeated his behaviour towards anyone's mother on here and she said she was calling the police, posters on here would tell her they are only hurty words.

[PG30]

The thing is saying hurty words against people I don’t know has no effect on my own life.

Where as when he makes these simplistic, populist, xenophobic, racist little YouTube videos. I tend to agree with these points and they feeds my hatred to people different to me.

So the first one has no impact on my life where as the other one warms my heart.

[shivah]

Nope. Wasn’t found guilty of that. Jeremy Whine an elitist got upset. That’s all.

He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

[subsub]

He stalked four people, two of them have protection orders against him. It's interesting how many people defend stalkers - each to their own
I guess.

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.

[Vespa]

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.

Defending a convicted stalker is an odd hill to die on.

[shivah]

Was he standing behind them? Was he opening their mail? Was he following them to work or the shops?

Hurty words isn't stalking. The law isn't an arse on this, but a complete cunt.

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.

You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.

[subsub]

Your defending someone who chooses to make other people's lives a misery and stalked them, that's on you.

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.

You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.

Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.

[Vespa]

and as usual Vespa you aren't reading you are just assuming.

His sentencing notes are here - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl ... 160922.pdf

This guy harassed not only the people he was prosecuted for but their children, parents, partners and friends. You support his actions.

You are getting into trolling territory here......

No, he's not. He's merely pointing out that you're going out of your way to defend the behaviour of a convicted serial stalker.

Nope. Just saying it's a ridiculous situation where "hurty words" on the internet are called stalking now.

What next? Saying "I wish someone was dead" and you are arrested for attempted murder?

But your repeated use of the term "hurty words" seems to be a genuine attempt to belittle the serious offences Belfield was jailed for.
Again, I'll ask the question: how would you feel if someone close to you was the subject of repeated, targeted harassment? Would you tell them that it was just "hurty words" and that they need to get over themselves?

There is a major difference between "hurty words" on Twitter than proper, physical harassment. Treating the two as the same is utter folly.

Yes, there is a difference. Both are still crimes, however.
And you're still trying to defend Belfield’s behaviour.

You are talking rubbish. You've now agreed with my intention which is good however - that there is a difference between hurty words and physical stalking. Thanks.

Of course they're different; I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed otherwise.
But you keep on using the term "hurty words" in an apparent attempt to belittle his crimes. That's your choice, but I don't think many rational people would agree with you.

Publishing pictures of his wife and kids is hardy hurty anything. He hounded these poor people, I hope YouTube demonistise his videos.