Page 67 of 78

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:47 am
by Eaststand
so were iphones. Doesnt mean its a foriegn matter, it means people are evolving new ways to fuck other peoples shit up.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:49 am
by kancutlawns
theleader82 wrote:
kancutlawns wrote:Ah yes, conveniently lifted from a far right anti Muslim think tank but no mention of the record of white men committing acid attacks. Obviously, you’re floundering a little as this poorly researched article is your equivalent of farting in a lift and scarpering so let’s leave it at that Leader. You can’t back up your comments.

You’re not willing to debate . Acid attackd were unheard of 10 years ago

But you said they were imported from the subcontinent. Sexting and drones sold on Amazon were also unheard of ten years ago. I still can’t see anything to back up your comment.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:51 am
by Eaststand
Speak for yourself, man. I was sexting in the 90s.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:52 am
by kancutlawns
Eaststand wrote:Speak for yourself, man. I was sexting in the 90s.

:lol:

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:59 am
by kancutlawns
Eaststand wrote:so were iphones. Doesnt mean its a foriegn matter, it means people are evolving new ways to fuck other peoples shit up.

Like stun guns, laser pens, multi blade flick knives in years gone by. Cunts will use whatever means they have at their disposal to disable and rob others. Whatever’s quick and easy to use, to create pain and fear on others and maximise short term gain with little chance of detection. It’s not really a racial thing, more gang related and to do with trends.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:06 pm
by Roy Twing
A good read, for those still clinging to the propaganda that these scandals are 'nowt to do with religion':

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/ro ... 61831.html

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 4:47 pm
by Hillman avenger
Go back and read that again, Roy.

The victim goes on to say that it is a major mistake to condemn the religion and its believers because some manipulate the text to find a justification for what they do. Just like we know "Christians" who quote the bible in support of doing evil acts.

And the point is made that if you do that , you include a great majority of followers who are as critical of that behaviour as we are. And you drive them towards the people who want to radicalise them to join in terrorism, or at least to turn a blind eye to it.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 8:12 pm
by Roy Twing
Why do I bother.
No-one (that I know) is condemning the entire 'religion'.
I can't be bothered to clarify further.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 8:29 pm
by m4rkb
There are loads of plastic muslims . Young men who grow beards to show their devotion to Islam and then go on to do everything un-islamic according to so called proper muslims. This does not mean their 'un-islamic' actions are unrelated to Islam.

You could say the same about the prison population. None of the inmates could be described as Muslims yet they form a profound group of extremists apparently devoted to the religion. It's pure gang warfare with a common bond of Islam.

I'd say it's akin to anyone who self identifies as anything actually being what they claim regardless of who stupid it seems. Like a six foot man with a beard claiming to be a woman. If they claim to be muslims then they are.

What we have is an immense gang culture steeped in Islam as it's excuse. That makes it a massive Islamic problem regardless of trying to defend any one religion.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:26 am
by Zambo
Class post.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:44 pm
by Royal24s
Hillman avenger wrote:Go back and read that again, Roy.

The victim goes on to say that it is a major mistake to condemn the religion and its believers because some manipulate the text to find a justification for what they do. Just like we know "Christians" who quote the bible in support of doing evil acts.

And the point is made that if you do that , you include a great majority of followers who are as critical of that behaviour as we are. And you drive them towards the people who want to radicalise them to join in terrorism, or at least to turn a blind eye to it.


So by that logic Christians would be drawn toward terrorism when they see their religion constantly berated by all and sundry including yourself ?
Doesn't seem to be happening though, does it ?

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 1:46 pm
by Hillman avenger
You can't be that stupid.

It's not difficult. Extremists who wrap Islam around the evil they do are at best misguided, but more likely opportunistic. Many muslims resent what they do which harms the religion, but when they see the idiots who claim it's all muslims to be afraid of and therefore, confront, it's no wonder they are easy meat for the extremists.

Much evil has been done in the name of Christ over the centuries.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:12 pm
by Zambo
Hillman avenger wrote:You can't be that stupid.

It's not difficult. Extremists who wrap Islam around the evil they do are at best misguided, but more likely opportunistic. Many muslims resent what they do which harms the religion, but when they see the idiots who claim it's all muslims to be afraid of and therefore, confront, it's no wonder they are easy meat for the extremists.

Much evil has been done in the name of Christ over the centuries.

When is the next Islam against terrorism march?

The silence to condemn is still deafening.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:31 pm
by Darkyboy
Zambo wrote:
Hillman avenger wrote:You can't be that stupid.

It's not difficult. Extremists who wrap Islam around the evil they do are at best misguided, but more likely opportunistic. Many muslims resent what they do which harms the religion, but when they see the idiots who claim it's all muslims to be afraid of and therefore, confront, it's no wonder they are easy meat for the extremists.

Much evil has been done in the name of Christ over the centuries.

When is the next Islam against terrorism march?

The silence to condemn is still deafening.


It has to be a march to condemn Israel, Britain or the US, for the habitual protesters to get involved.

Re: The Religion of Peace? (Part 2)

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:44 pm
by Roy Twing
Here's a good example of how the establishment (and the liberal media) goes out of its way to take blame away from islam when there can be no denial of its connection to terrorism:
The judge stated in sentencing: “You have violated the Koran and Islam by your actions" - anything to avoid stating the obvious.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... cad04e041f