talkFORUM

Seems to have now changed from Putin ordering russian 'hacking' to 'russian influence'

all of the hundreds of millions, maybe into billions spent by both sides...well, more one side than the other.....and all they had to do was ask the 'russians' to 'influence' the american public

julian assange, who thus far, his rape accusation being the exception, has not been wrong, and has simply published real articles, states categorically that russia did not provide wikileaks with the truth about clinton

paolo wrote:Seems to have now changed from Putin ordering russian 'hacking' to 'russian influence'

all of the hundreds of millions, maybe into billions spent by both sides...well, more one side than the other.....and all they had to do was ask the 'russians' to 'influence' the american public

julian assange, who thus far, his rape accusation being the exception, has not been wrong, and has simply published real articles, states categorically that russia did not provide wikileaks with the truth about clinton

Russian influence, that amongst other things included Russian hacking.

So worse than just ordering hacking

PG30 wrote:

paolo wrote:Seems to have now changed from Putin ordering russian 'hacking' to 'russian influence'

all of the hundreds of millions, maybe into billions spent by both sides...well, more one side than the other.....and all they had to do was ask the 'russians' to 'influence' the american public

julian assange, who thus far, his rape accusation being the exception, has not been wrong, and has simply published real articles, states categorically that russia did not provide wikileaks with the truth about clinton

Russian influence, that amongst other things included Russian hacking.

So worse than just ordering hacking

Kind of like forced usa regime change or USA funded. Colour revolutions

I'll be doing my own form of Russian hacking later today.....

PG30 wrote:

paolo wrote:Seems to have now changed from Putin ordering russian 'hacking' to 'russian influence'

all of the hundreds of millions, maybe into billions spent by both sides...well, more one side than the other.....and all they had to do was ask the 'russians' to 'influence' the american public

julian assange, who thus far, his rape accusation being the exception, has not been wrong, and has simply published real articles, states categorically that russia did not provide wikileaks with the truth about clinton

Russian influence, that amongst other things included Russian hacking.

So worse than just ordering hacking

If Russia had free & fair elections Putin wouldn't be so keen to interfere in the elections of other countries for fear the same could be done to him. However, being an opponent of Putin is incredibly dangerous & anyone seriously challenging his position wouldn't last long.

It's not only America. It's just now he's so brazenly meddled in an American election we've started taking notice. Russia seems to have drifted back to an authoritarian dictatorship without many people taking much notice.

No, I don't really know what that means either.

paolo wrote:Seems to have now changed from Putin ordering russian 'hacking' to 'russian influence'

all of the hundreds of millions, maybe into billions spent by both sides...well, more one side than the other.....and all they had to do was ask the 'russians' to 'influence' the american public

julian assange, who thus far, his rape accusation being the exception, has not been wrong, and has simply published real articles, states categorically that russia did not provide wikileaks with the truth about clinton

Have you been hacked?

You are writing complete sentences.

Not at all like the Obama regime deliberately interfering with the Israeli elections last year, was it?

Which was another stunning victory for Obama's cunning planners.

Basualdo wrote:Not at all like the Obama regime deliberately interfering with the Israeli elections last year, was it?

Which was another stunning victory for Obama's cunning planners.

You're right. It's nothing like Obama 'interfering' in the Israeli election.

If it was true they would have proved it by now.

I've got a 12 inch prick; I will tell you 1000's of times until you believe me, without me actually having to flop it out and prove it.

Is this meant to be irony?
It's people like you that do the Russians "influencing" by spreading their propaganda under the guise of "truth".

Fug1 wrote:If it was true they would have proved it by now.

I've got a 12 inch prick; I will tell you 1000's of times until you believe me, without me actually having to flop it out and prove it.

I believe you. Why would you lie about anything like that.

Zambo wrote:

Fug1 wrote:If it was true they would have proved it by now.

I've got a 12 inch prick; I will tell you 1000's of times until you believe me, without me actually having to flop it out and prove it.

I believe you. Why would you lie about anything like that.

It would be true if you replaced "I've got" with "I am"

Can't believe that mate, despite roooting for The Baggies.

warmleatherette wrote:Is this meant to be irony?
It's people like you that do the Russians "influencing" by spreading their propaganda under the guise of "truth".

It's interesting that Brexit, trump and 2016 seems to be a gateway drug into Marine Le pen and Putin for some people.

Sick of lefties, so let's go so far right too the alternative. Even prepared to see world war 3 if it gives those Libtards a kicking