talkFORUM

Kowalski wrote:Hard to believe that Putin is dodgy.

I’d certainly put her m up there with Blair and Obama

After all Julian did for Trump and he repays him by pretending he barely knows what Wikileaks is. No longer useful to him so doesn’t care what happens to him.

Or perhaps he's distancing himself from any decision to help him . Let's hope so

You’ve got to admire the ruthlessness of team Trump. You’re either useful to them or you’re not.

As ever you try to dismiss. As I said, there are cases where it isn't necessary to name them, because once it's known information was provided, it is clear who that would be. Or they might take out a few people just to be sure.
These are terrorists,, not people making careful judgements
And it HAS happened.
As far as him facing the charges in Sweden is concerned, the first one has lapsed purely because there is a five-year statute of limitations in Sweden, which he managed to evade by being out of reach since 2012. The second one is still valid.
Why should he not face that charge if there is evidence to answer?
It is sadly a feature of this forum to do things like calling them "spurious" because there is the eternal stupid conspiracy theory on top.
None of us know the strength of the evidence, but if he is innocent and has been set up, why would he spend years in hiding and hundreds of thousands of pounds of other peoples' money avoiding facing them?

Hillman avenger wrote:As ever you try to dismiss. As I said, there are cases where it isn't necessary to name them,because once it's known information was provided, it is clear who that would be. Or they might take out a few people just to be sure.
These are terrorists,, not people making careful judgements
And it HAS happened.
As far as him facing the charges in Sweden is concerned, the first one has lapsed purely because there is a five-year statute of limitations in Sweden, which he managed to evade by being out of reach since 2012. The second one is still valid.
Why should he not face that charge if there is evidence to answer?
It is sadly a feature of this forum to do things like calling them "spurious" because there is the eternal stupid conspiracy theory on top.
None of us know the strength of the evidence, but if he is innocent and has been set up, why would he spend years in hiding and hundreds of thousands of pounds of other peoples' money avoiding facing them?

What purpose does it serve releasing unredacted lists of gay people, rape victims and people’s medical records in Saudi Arabia? They have a casual disregard for other people’s safety/lives.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 06901.html

Just dumping leaked documents into the public domain with little thought for the consequences isn’t journalism or even whistleblowing.

I performed some complex research into his name and was able to extract:

Jew
Lying

Ass
Angel

Coincidence?

Hillman avenger wrote:As ever you try to dismiss. As I said, there are cases where it isn't necessary to name them, because once it's known information was provided, it is clear who that would be. Or they might take out a few people just to be sure.
These are terrorists,, not people making careful judgements
And it HAS happened.
As far as him facing the charges in Sweden is concerned, the first one has lapsed purely because there is a five-year statute of limitations in Sweden, which he managed to evade by being out of reach since 2012. The second one is still valid.
Why should he not face that charge if there is evidence to answer?
It is sadly a feature of this forum to do things like calling them "spurious" because there is the eternal stupid conspiracy theory on top.
None of us know the strength of the evidence, but if he is innocent and has been set up, why would he spend years in hiding and hundreds of thousands of pounds of other peoples' money avoiding facing them?

That's nonsense because 99% of serious crime arrests are made because they've been grassed. They obviously know that but it's done in a way that wouldn't identify the informant.
Actually I had one in Liverpool who made more money grassing to the Met than he did from crime. The insulation was that the arrests were made by Met detectives and they were swifted off to a London police station, so they assumed the leak was at that end.
Northern Ireland had more touts in the Falls Road than you find outside Wembley on cup final day, and the same applies.

Again, I think you're just believing some bullshit which has been put out to vilify Assange, because they haven't named any alleged revenge victims.

No help is needed in the case against Assange.
Irresponsible, egotistic, gullible.
His running away from the Swedish charges is disgraceful, and of course he knows he can rely on the conspiracy barmy army to help him portray them as an attempt to silence the truth. Contemptible.
Even turned the country foolish enough to harbour him, into an enemy with his behaviour.

Do you think it's a bad thing to reveal the wrongdoings and crimes of governments Hillman ?

Royal24s wrote:Do you think it's a bad thing to reveal the wrongdoings and crimes of governments Hillman ?

Of course not.
Apparently you do, though, given the investigations into the corruption around Trump.
But there are ways of doing these things. Assange is too arrogant to consider the consequences of his actions on "little people" and he is so vain he is an easy dupe of Putin.

Hillman avenger wrote:

Royal24s wrote:Do you think it's a bad thing to reveal the wrongdoings and crimes of governments Hillman ?

Of course not.
Apparently you do, though, given the investigations into the corruption around Trump.
But there are ways of doing these things. Assange is too arrogant to consider the consequences of his actions on "little people" and he is so vain he is an easy dupe of Putin.

He knows exactly what he’s doing and what Putin’s about. Anyone who thinks he’s a defender of democracy & a free press is living in a dream world.

We should keep in mind the right to free speech and a free press when working out how to deal with Assange. But let’s not pretend he’s on the same side.

I like the fact he's basically Kevin the teenager.

The Ecuadorians cut off his Internet for being naughty

They told him off for refusing to feed his pet.

He wouldn't tidy up his room.

Mummy and Daddy Ecuador kicked him out of the family home.

Sent from my Mi MIX 2 using Tapatalk

Jailed for fifty weeks. That’s his Christmas fucked then.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc. ... k-48118908

He has already cost the taxpayer 16m, now we are putting him up in another hotel. Deport the cunt.