Page 9 of 11

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:45 am
by beingsoblase
Basualdo wrote:We've already been all over this.
And remember even the best have their headstaggers. Writing for a kids show is no crime.


42.


The thing is with this new series of doctor who, it was the only alternative to the reality dancing/skating/karaoke shite that they were churning out on Saturday.
Off course now it's been shifted to Sunday so dancing on shite can have another fucking hour on the telly, and will be another excuse if this show flops.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:54 am
by Basualdo
beingsoblase wrote:
Basualdo wrote:We've already been all over this.
And remember even the best have their headstaggers. Writing for a kids show is no crime.


42.


The thing is with this new series of doctor who, it was the only alternative to the reality dancing/skating/karaoke shite that they were churning out on Saturday.
Off course now it's been shifted to Sunday so dancing on shite can have another fucking hour on the telly, and will be another excuse if this show flops.

To be honest, like all small boys at the time as a kid I used to like it in the Pertwee era. But then I reached 9 or 10 and grew out of it.

The new incarnation is just embarrassing.

What next, Chorlton and the Wheelies reimagined for adults? Cloppa Castle - After Dark?

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:59 am
by beingsoblase
Basualdo wrote:
beingsoblase wrote:
Basualdo wrote:We've already been all over this.
And remember even the best have their headstaggers. Writing for a kids show is no crime.


42.


The thing is with this new series of doctor who, it was the only alternative to the reality dancing/skating/karaoke shite that they were churning out on Saturday.
Off course now it's been shifted to Sunday so dancing on shite can have another fucking hour on the telly, and will be another excuse if this show flops.

To be honest, like all small boys at the time as a kid I used to like it in the Pertwee era. But then I reached 9 or 10 and grew out of it.

The new incarnation is just embarrassing.

What next, Chorlton and the Wheelies reimagined for adults? Cloppa Castle - After Dark?


Well, now you say that a dark,gritty re imaging of the clangers......

I'd watch that!

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:56 pm
by lambrini
It doesn't matter whether Doctor Who is a man or a woman, but problems arise when motivations become ideological and / or political. It is evident that Mx Whittaker was chosen solely on the basis of her gender rather than individual merit, hailed as a "feminist icon" and pathetically fawned over by the Beeb and social justice warriors. Like many other franchises such as Marvel, Star Wars and Star Trek, Doctor Who has been this way for some time. In last year's Christmas episode the Beeb purposely portrayed the first doctor as a sexist imbecile, which is factually untrue and a damnation to William Hartnell.

Anita Sakeesian complains Whittaker isn't enough: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... octor-who/
"It needs to be said that [Doctor Who] is still an OVERWHELMINGLY white show and that issues of representation do not exist in isolation from each other (...) It’s not as if you fix the ‘woman’ problem, THEN fix the ‘race’ problem, THEN the ‘queer/trans’ problem, etc. It all has to happen in tandem."
How can everything 'happen in tandem'? Her argument is invalid because the fractionation of diversity and equality of Doctor Who is infinite, and as Jordan Peterson points out, will never be enough!


Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:06 pm
by lambrini
deisegirl wrote:
JW90 wrote:
Lou Grant wrote:Note that I announced the new doctor who 30 mins before the BBC. See tennis thread.

The Twitter meltdown is a joy and the Daily Mail has melted in a pool of outrage.


Not before they've managed to find her in the nude in other shows.


:lol:


Lol, post of the week. :)

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:40 pm
by Zambo
Bradley Walsh stole the show.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:56 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
What about BradWig? He knows about doctors and says WHO? when told WADA are at the door. Also has a magic jiffy bag.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:33 pm
by black_guardian
Zambo wrote:Bradley Walsh stole the show.


I prefer to think Bradley Walsh is stealing a living...

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:36 pm
by Basualdo
Zambo wrote:Bradley Walsh stole the show.

Thank fuck, because with the state of the clown police we have today, they'll never get it back.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:52 pm
by Zambo
Brad's a good lad, salt of the earth and all that. Best actor by a mile in all that garbage.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:56 pm
by AlcoholBrazil
Zambo wrote:Brad's a good lad, salt of the earth and all that. Best actor by a mile in all that garbage.


Still amazed how a middle-aged white heterosexual male could even get on the show.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:29 am
by Hillman avenger
Tom Baker- who wasn't the original DW- is a good mate of Laurie Taylor, the excellent presenter of Thinking Allowed.

They were out on the lash in Liverpool and went in a pub where Baker was identified straight off, but in a good way. He ordered drinks all around on him, prompted by his appearance on a TV ad on the TV in the pub, and it reminded him of how generously he was being paid.

The barman complied but refused to serve Baker himself, on the grounds that he felt sorry for the Cybermen.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:17 am
by beingsoblase
lambrini wrote:It doesn't matter whether Doctor Who is a man or a woman, but problems arise when motivations become ideological and / or political. It is evident that Mx Whittaker was chosen solely on the basis of her gender rather than individual merit, hailed as a "feminist icon" and pathetically fawned over by the Beeb and social justice warriors. Like many other franchises such as Marvel, Star Wars and Star Trek, Doctor Who has been this way for some time. In last year's Christmas episode the Beeb purposely portrayed the first doctor as a sexist imbecile, which is factually untrue and a damnation to William Hartnell.

Anita Sakeesian complains Whittaker isn't enough: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... octor-who/
"It needs to be said that [Doctor Who] is still an OVERWHELMINGLY white show and that issues of representation do not exist in isolation from each other (...) It’s not as if you fix the ‘woman’ problem, THEN fix the ‘race’ problem, THEN the ‘queer/trans’ problem, etc. It all has to happen in tandem."
How can everything 'happen in tandem'? Her argument is invalid because the fractionation of diversity and equality of Doctor Who is infinite, and as Jordan Peterson points out, will never be enough!




That would be Anita sarkeesian who has been a doctor who can for years and who totally didn't jump on a twitter bandwagon then?
Just like she's a long time gamer...

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 9:32 pm
by Vespa
I've been watching the show and it's the best it has been for several years.

Re: New Doctor Who a 'woman'.

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:50 am
by mrGP
Zambo wrote:Bradley Walsh stole the show.

He's very good in it.
Is a top fella by all accounts too.