Harvey Weinstein

Music, TV, movies, anything else media not Talksport related
Post Reply
User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12974
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by The Tick »

Eaststand wrote:
The Tick wrote:
kancutlawns wrote:
The Tick wrote:
Eaststand wrote:Or, not do it, tell the authorities, and get another job.

Yeah, thats what a normal person would do. Oh, but then they wouldnt get famous, would they? I see now.

And there are women who spoke out and stood up to Weinstein, and had their careers ruined and their names sullied. The fear engendered by that discouraged other women from doing the same. It’s all about putting responsibility and blame solely on the victim. Damned whatever action they take

Not at all. Remarkable isn’t it with all the strong, influential women in the acting, celebrity litigation and agency community in Hollywood that no one could have come out and gone to the enforcement authorities. We’re not talking about toilet cleaners from Central America on below minimum wage who have been threatened with being returned to drug cartels are we? Struggling with your explanations that women had to wait years or decades to report this. No real responsibility or inner strength for waiting until everyone comes out of the woodwork. Very tawdry, undignified and without credibility from where I am sitting.


Again the fact they are rich and known isn't enough. We've seen how women in Hollywood are still treated unfairly in many ways, from salaries to casting and now in the case of sexual harassment and assault. The culture in Hollywood is one that still benefits the wealthy men who control it.

And many of the actresses who were subjected to Weinstein's advances were unknown at the time and those who spoke out were cut out of Hollywood and ignored thereafter. Now we have a mixture of high and low profile actresses coming out, perhaps relieved that the initial accusers have not faced severe reprimand as others had done in the past. The attitude towards women is becoming more fair, but is still lagging especially industries such as Hollywood.

he feels sorry for people making £20 million a movie instead of £30.


This geezers insane.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Yes when women make more money they should accept sexual assault, in the eyes of eaststand.

Some actresses were earning millions when assaulted by him, some were aspiring actresses with little money to their name. In all cases, his conduct was wrong.

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Eaststand »

no they shouldnt accept sexual assault.

These women werent sexually assaulted. they partook in sucking dick for legs up in the industry.

Who. Fucking. Cares. If youre a slut desperate for fame, good for you.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12974
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by The Tick »

Eaststand wrote:no they shouldnt accept sexual assault.

These women werent sexually assaulted. they partook in sucking dick for legs up in the industry.

Who. Fucking. Cares. If youre a slut desperate for fame, good for you.



No, Weinstein made unwanted sexual advances upon women and physically forced himself on them. Sexual assault. That is why he's fallen.

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Eaststand »

No its not, people get sacked for allegations now.

Look at that kid from coranation street in the papers today, he allegedly did something to a bird in a nightclub, police are investigating (not convicting) him and hes been sacked.

Im putting less and less effort into my replies to you because you seem either too stupid or too stubborn to recognise the massive difference.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34385
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Carlos J »

There is a Weinstein thread in 'Music and other Media', chaps.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12974
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by The Tick »

Eaststand wrote:No its not, people get sacked for allegations now.

Look at that kid from coranation street in the papers today, he allegedly did something to a bird in a nightclub, police are investigating (not convicting) him and hes been sacked.

Im putting less and less effort into my replies to you because you seem either too stupid or too stubborn to recognise the massive difference.


Weinstein himself has admitted his sexual harrasments.

And as for that Coronation Street actor, he has been let go after an internal enquiry by the producers. If he is cleared wrongdoing by the police, he should be entitled to claim for relevant losses.

User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12974
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by The Tick »

Carlos J wrote:There is a Weinstein thread in 'Music and other Media', chaps.


Yes but eaststand chose to shoehorn reference to Weinstein's case into this thread while ironically ranting about how such a story has pushed the Las Vegas massacre out of the media spotlight.

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Eaststand »

because its clearly a smokescreen.

Nice one on the "wah wah wah he was the naughty boy, teacher" shit though.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12974
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by The Tick »

You're being silly now, eaststand.

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34385
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Carlos J »

Eaststand wrote:because its clearly a smokescreen.

Nice one on the "wah wah wah he was the naughty boy, teacher" shit though.

Back on topic, please.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Eaststand »

it is on topic. it is not a coincidence such a meaningless non story such as this weinstein nonsense has been used to completely bury the las vegas shooting.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34385
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Carlos J »

I have noted that point already. But if you want to go into the details of Weinstein, there is a thread for it. That's all.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Eaststand
Registered user
Posts: 17966
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:36 pm
Location: having a smoochy smooch

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Eaststand »

Sweet bruvva, duly noted.
Build Back More Betterer

User avatar
Carlos J
Forum Admin
Posts: 34385
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:32 am
Location: Searching for Celia.

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Carlos J »

No worries. Get your teeth into that thread as well.
Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's Maybelline.

Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

User avatar
Rossco
Registered user
Posts: 5778
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:25 pm
Location: Stuck in the Middle with you

Re: Las Vegas shooting

Post by Rossco »

The Tick wrote:
Eaststand wrote:no they shouldnt accept sexual assault.

These women werent sexually assaulted. they partook in sucking dick for legs up in the industry.

Who. Fucking. Cares. If youre a slut desperate for fame, good for you.



No, Weinstein made unwanted sexual advances upon women and physically forced himself on them. Sexual assault. That is why he's fallen.


Weinstein is a POS for many reasons. He has annoyed someone higher up to get what is happening to him. Or he is in the background still. This bullshit is a distraction from Las Vegas and funny enough this thread going the same way.

Long story short Weinstein used his position of power to buck wee slags looking fame and were happy to get bucked and take a facial from that fat POS.

Now can we get back on topic please gents.
Psalm 23 - The Lord Is My Shepherd

Ezekiel 25:17

Post Reply