Page 15 of 19

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:20 pm
by delboy1983
theleader82 wrote:George Riley has been suspended from 5 live for inappropriate behaviour

What the beanpole that used to play for Watford,surely not :!:

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 12:37 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:11 am
by Eaststand
BREAKING NEWS:

off her box lying slag claims drugs charges are part of campaign to silence her.

No theyre not you neurotic little crack head. And now we see why she was so willing to suck harveys weiner. Coke whores are splendid fun.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4805385/r ... ilence-me/

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:24 pm
by Shedboy
It seems being "sexually harassed" has become de rigeur.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:45 am
by Carlos J
God, this could go on a number of topics. Haven't watched in full yet. Though released in 2014, was re-released online last month after the Weinstein allegations started, see Mr Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Secret. See Mail after release: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -York.html

Bryan Singer mentioned, has had allegation made before, directed Spacey in 'The Usual Suspects'. That means nothing itself, but hey: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/b ... ase-699828


Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 7:11 am
by carcinogen
Shedboy wrote:It seems being "sexually harassed" has become de rigeur.


The sad thing is, for all the genuine cases, there seems to be about 100 fantasists all clambering on the bangwagon.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:28 pm
by Lord Notin Kwestion
Old Charlie Manson was right all along.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 9:39 pm
by Eaststand
he did have kind of point, I suppose.

Sort of put it across a bit wrong though.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:26 pm
by theleader82
Corey feldman is going to name the Hollywood producer who abused him and Corey haim

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:41 pm
by Eaststand
presumably waiting for the biggest truck load of money from the talk show most willing to secure the exclusive.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:09 am
by Shedboy
One of the latest claims against Spacey has me scratching my head (no pun intended). Tony Montana (Who he? Ed.) claims that Spacey "forcefully" grabbed his crotch when he (Montana) was 30 years old which caused him to suffer PTSD for six months.

Now, we're not all cut from the same cloth I know but if that had happened to me or my mates the boy would have been told to fuck off and would have had a smack in the pus in the process. Matter closed, no PTSD.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:19 am
by Eaststand
Its comments like that that make you realise every fucking cunt involved in this shit is lying their ass off for more sueage money.

They probably did do what is said, but anyone who doesn't think "that was weird/mildly annoying" and go back to their lives is bullshitting to the max.

Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:38 am
by Shedboy
Nowadays when you tell a woman it looks cold outside, she'll assume you're talking about the weather.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:58 am
by Basualdo
Eaststand wrote:presumably waiting for the biggest truck load of money from the talk show most willing to secure the exclusive.

He's named some unknown actor called John Grissom. A name so stellar that his imdb page has no photo and only 2 movie credits. One was as a limo driver and the other was as a PE teacher - which must have been a dream role for the disgusting old nonce when you think about it.

Re: Harvey Weinstein

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:04 am
by Eaststand
So he got nonced by a normal person. I see now why Hollywood didn't care. It wasn't anything to do with them.

Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk