kancutlawns wrote:Stealth banned apparently but then again not, perhaps.
Not is correct.
kancutlawns wrote:Stealth banned apparently but then again not, perhaps.
AlcoholBrazil wrote:unfortunately the women in favour of this ad don't shave either.
Tind wrote:I'm a woman and I don't like the advert. It's incredibly patronising towards men. I've not seen it on the telly other than when it's been criticised. Everyone should stop buying their products.
Peace and Love
Jon Gout wrote:Tind wrote:I'm a woman and I don't like the advert. It's incredibly patronising towards men. I've not seen it on the telly other than when it's been criticised. Everyone should stop buying their products.
Peace and Love
I'm a man and I love it. I love how it riles up thickos/those who are extremely sensitive and triggered by their own lack of logic. It's brilliant seeing what the reaction has been, especially when it's come from those who often tell others to grow up, get thicker skin and get over things. Bravo to Gillette. Give them a taste of their own medicine.
(I haven't bought one of their products in at least 15 years.)
Jon Gout wrote:Ah, the classic Daily Mail-style "But what about, but what about...?" What about anything? It's like when Iceland banned palm oil in their own products. Right wing thick people whinging on: "But what about the non-Iceland products you stock that contain palm oil? What about those? You hypocritical bastards, why ban one thing and not another?!" Yes, what about those? You have to start somewhere, so why not with the thing that is easiest and wouldn't result in a large and sudden detrimental impact on their business? Running such a big business is a balance between profits and ethics. Something is better than nothing, and something always comes before everything. Who knows what Gillette will do next. It'll no doubt be something, since they know their next move will be under even more scrutiny than usual. Perhaps it will be a ban on animal testing, who knows. It seems completely pointless to criticise them for trying to do one good thing just because they do several bad things though. That's like saying a man shouldn't donate £20 to a kid's charity just because he shagged his mate's wife. The kids who would benefit from that donation don't care, and I don't see why they should.