Owen Jones kicked in the head

[kancutlawns]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

he's an insipid irrelevance, seen as a joke even by the far left

So if he’s irrelevant it’s not an issue really is it?

Well, maybe not for you lawns, but I find it to be an issue

Good guy or contemptible shithouse, he is allowed to voice opinions without the fear of violence

If the perps are caught, lock them up

Your relatively new further lean to the left puzzles but I would hope you support jones in so far as he should have free speech without fear

See, that’s the kind of thing that closes down debate around here. Calling someone with different views on ‘the left’.

[paolo]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

he's an insipid irrelevance, seen as a joke even by the far left

So if he’s irrelevant it’s not an issue really is it?

Well, maybe not for you lawns, but I find it to be an issue

Good guy or contemptible shithouse, he is allowed to voice opinions without the fear of violence

If the perps are caught, lock them up

Your relatively new further lean to the left puzzles but I would hope you support jones in so far as he should have free speech without fear

See, that’s the kind of thing that closes down debate around here. Calling someone with different views on ‘the left’.

Balancing out ‘the far right’ which seems to be the norm

Address the other points now....

[paolo]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Can you expand on that, subbles?

I can. He’s questioning the word “incites” when Jones doesn’t appear to have incited anyone to inflict violence on others unlike some individuals on ‘the right’.

You closing down debate again?

[shabbado]

One of the more sinister posters on here took issue with me because I suggested that his calling of John Bercow to be 'door stepped' or 'Cook-ed' as he called it was in extremely poor taste in the current political climate.

[The Ghost of Alex Higgins]

Smollett changed the game

[paolo]

One of the more sinister posters on here took issue with me because I suggested that his calling of John Bercow to be 'door stepped' or 'Cook-ed' as he called it was in extremely poor taste in the current political climate.

One of the tough guy posters on here had his wings clipped and threw his toys out of the pram

His attack went to pansy where he had many opportunities to be specific with his triggerings

He failed, as per

Then resulted to sub tactics

As he knows, or perhaps he doesn’t, ol rog would famously knock on the doors of crime and hold them to task

Rig was never violent nor did he threaten violence

The chump will continue to fail on explaining his triggering

[subsub]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Can you expand on that, subbles?

Of course.

Definition of incite in English:
1. Encourage or stir up (violent or unlawful behaviour)
1.1 Urge or persuade (someone) to act in a violent or unlawful way

Has Owen Jones encouraged people to act in a violent or unlawful way? No.

Hope that helps.

[shabbado]

One of the more sinister posters on here took issue with me because I suggested that his calling of John Bercow to be 'door stepped' or 'Cook-ed' as he called it was in extremely poor taste in the current political climate.

One of the tough guy posters on here had his wings clipped and threw his toys out of the pram

His attack went to pansy where he had many opportunities to be specific with his triggerings

He failed, as per

Then resulted to sub tactics

As he knows, or perhaps he doesn’t, ol rog would famously knock on the doors of crime and hold them to task

Rig was never violent nor did he threaten violence

The chump will continue to fail on explaining his triggering

Talk about triggering.

[paolo]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Can you expand on that, subbles?

Of course.

Definition of incite in English:
1. Encourage or stir up (violent or unlawful behaviour)
1.1 Urge or persuade (someone) to act in a violent or unlawful way

Has Owen Jones encouraged people to act in a violent or unlawful way? No.

Hope that helps.

First time you’ve been straight on here

Fair play

So the comment is silly because Owen Jones, to your knowledge, hasn’t said something publicly that could incite violence?

[paolo]

One of the more sinister posters on here took issue with me because I suggested that his calling of John Bercow to be 'door stepped' or 'Cook-ed' as he called it was in extremely poor taste in the current political climate.

One of the tough guy posters on here had his wings clipped and threw his toys out of the pram

His attack went to pansy where he had many opportunities to be specific with his triggerings

He failed, as per

Then resulted to sub tactics

As he knows, or perhaps he doesn’t, ol rog would famously knock on the doors of crime and hold them to task

Rig was never violent nor did he threaten violence

The chump will continue to fail on explaining his triggering

Talk about triggering.

So you start something, get all pissy, can’t answer, wait a few days, bring it up again, can’t answer then.....

Chalk it up as another one of your Tf victories

[subsub]

So the comment is silly because Owen Jones, to your knowledge, hasn’t said something publicly that could incite violence?

You mentioned "what he incites" when he's never done anything of the kind.
So yes, it was a silly comment.

[paolo]

So the comment is silly because Owen Jones, to your knowledge, hasn’t said something publicly that could incite violence?

You mentioned "what he incites" when he's never done anything of the kind.
So yes, it was a silly comment.

I wondered if his rabid support of the ultra violent far left terrorist group antifa could incite violence

I’m sure you will join me in stating that violence against free speech is wrong and the attackers of Jones should be punished to the fullest extent of the law

[subsub]

I’m sure you will join me in stating that violence against free speech is wrong and the attackers of Jones should be punished to the fullest extent of the law

There's no such thing as free speech.
And that's a good thing, because it helps to limit the spread of racist, sexist and homophobic views.

[paolo]

I’m sure you will join me in stating that violence against free speech is wrong and the attackers of Jones should be punished to the fullest extent of the law

There's no such thing as free speech.
And that's a good thing, because it helps to limit the spread of racist, sexist and homophobic views.

Oh dear....

[subsub]

I’m sure you will join me in stating that violence against free speech is wrong and the attackers of Jones should be punished to the fullest extent of the law

There's no such thing as free speech.
And that's a good thing, because it helps to limit the spread of racist, sexist and homophobic views.

Oh dear....

You think that people should be free to air racist/sexist/homophobic views?
Bit weird.