Owen Jones kicked in the head

[Devondevon]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents, he should be free to voice his opinion

if he has been subject to violence, the perps must be locked up

if he has done a smollett, he must be imprisoned

wanker as he is, he must be believed unless it's proven otherwise

i would love to see him get smashed, legally, in a boxing ring, but his right to free speech must not be interfered with

What does he incite? He writes for the Guardian which has a pitiful readership. Don’t see him have any real profile.

Its readership does seem to be just 100% of the bbc and 50% of this forum.

I know that the Guardian has heck of a lot of readers.

Comments section on football, politics often attracts hundreds of comments. Some political issues attract thousands and thats just comments

Just like the Maajid Nawaz apparent "paki" calling and apparent racist attack, i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law. Id also like to know the circumstances too who the instigator was and who provoked it

[VeritasVincit]

" i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law."
Do you apply that principle to all reports of violence?

[paolo]

" i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law."
Do you apply that principle to all reports of violence?

absolutely agree with you, conviction does not relate to whether something happened or not

[Devondevon]

" i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law."
Do you apply that principle to all reports of violence?

I have deep mistrust of the likes of Nawaz and Jones.

For instance, Maajid Nawaz was apparently called a" paki" and assaulted outside a theatre in Soho back in February.

Any news yet?

The type of area Soho is.. It probably has CCTV everywhere

CCTV footage of attack?

CCTV footage of perpetrators?

Nothings been released

Any developments?

I just have deep mistrust of these people

[Devondevon]

" i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law."
Do you apply that principle to all reports of violence?

absolutely agree with you, conviction does not relate to whether something happened or not

Absolutely agree too but we're talking about the likes of Owen Jones and Maajid Nawaz who play identity politics and are insidious individuals

[VeritasVincit]

That's OK.
So it depends on who was attacked. As long as we know.

[kancutlawns]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

he's an insipid irrelevance, seen as a joke even by the far left

So if he’s irrelevant it’s not an issue really is it?

[Ralph]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

If you don’t follow him on Twitter and don’t read his Guardian columns you can go weeks without hearing from Owen Jones. The low IQ, violence prone right must actively follow what he’s saying so they can get angry & upset about it.

[kancutlawns]

" i will only believe they were attacked if there are convictions in the court of law."
Do you apply that principle to all reports of violence?

I have deep mistrust of the likes of Nawaz and Jones.

For instance, Maajid Nawaz was apparently called a" paki" and assaulted outside a theatre in Soho back in February.

Any news yet?

The type of area Soho is.. It probably has CCTV everywhere

CCTV footage of attack?

CCTV footage of perpetrators?

Nothings been released

Any developments?

I just have deep mistrust of these people

Are you condoning physical violence on someone then? As long as someone hasn’t the shit kicked out of them, as long as there are no reports about possibly ongoing investigations, you’re OK with it? Contemptible but not unexpected from you.

[kancutlawns]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

If you don’t follow him on Twitter and don’t read his Guardian columns you can go weeks without hearing from Owen Jones. The low IQ, violence prone right must actively follow what he’s saying so they can get angry & upset about it.

They need someone to get upset about. They like justifying their craving for violence these snowflake gammons and then thinking it’s OK if they can’t find any tweets about convictions.

[subsub]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

[kancutlawns]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Not yet seen what he has incited. Cue more deflection about the BBC. 3..2..1...

[paolo]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Can you expand on that, subbles?

[paolo]

Do you have a breakdown of who follows him so we can substantiate your assertion? As far as I’ve seen no one who you dislike here has quoted him. Not sure why the BBC has been shoehorned into this. Posters would be screaming if the DM had similarly been randomly dropped in.

he's an insipid irrelevance, seen as a joke even by the far left

So if he’s irrelevant it’s not an issue really is it?

Well, maybe not for you lawns, but I find it to be an issue

Good guy or contemptible shithouse, he is allowed to voice opinions without the fear of violence

If the perps are caught, lock them up

Your relatively new further lean to the left puzzles but I would hope you support jones in so far as he should have free speech without fear

[kancutlawns]

regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents

What a ludicrous use of the word 'incites'.
Silly comment.

Can you expand on that, subbles?

I can. He’s questioning the word “incites” when Jones doesn’t appear to have incited anyone to inflict violence on others unlike some individuals on ‘the right’.