Quite right.paolo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:44 pmQuite rightVespa wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:37 pmI'm not a fan of Jones, I think like many online commentators their output is steered more by their traffic analytics than their real opinions - you can see that is Jones' work over the year.paolo wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 11:26 pmDue process has happened, and it was found that Jones was attacked because he is gay
totally unacceptable and so much so that it doesn't even need to be said
was there an element of him being attacked because he's a horrible little provoking shithouse? probably, but that is STILL totally unacceptable
owen jones, that aright wing apprentice slag who was caught getting reamed in a field, it doesn't matter, free speech should be allowed without the threat of violence
one would hope that the sentence that the perp serves will act as a deterrent
again, it shouldn't need to be said, but for the benefit of the resident provocateurs on here, no physical attack on folks for their sexual orientation, religious beliefs etc should be tolerated
mincing is still bad
r, t and s can try to double down, and fascist their way thru it...
from the first page of the thread
regardless of what jones stands for, what he incites and what he represents, he should be free to voice his opinion
if he has been subject to violence, the perps must be locked up
if he has done a smollett, he must be imprisoned
wanker as he is, he must be believed unless it's proven otherwise
i would love to see him get smashed, legally, in a boxing ring, but his right to free speech must not be interfered with
However, when people support the defence of a violent far-right homophobic thug on an aggravated assault charge I'm going to say something because I've met these people and they aren't heroes.
The thug has no defence
Thats why hes in jail.
Still funny though.