Vespa wrote:I vote Green, even if they can't win - because I'd rather vote for something than waste it on a shitty compromise.
Replace 'green ' with 'brexit' and I agree entirely
Vespa wrote:I vote Green, even if they can't win - because I'd rather vote for something than waste it on a shitty compromise.
shivah wrote:Zippy wrote:Beats voting for a fringe, anti-semitic crank, to be fair.
You mean Boris Johnson?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 39346.html
delboy1983 wrote:What time is your flight out of here Hillman to somewhere you are appreciated.
AlcoholBrazil wrote:delboy1983 wrote:What time is your flight out of here Hillman to somewhere you are appreciated.
Brace yourself for Sterling to plummet if a Corbyn Government is on the cards.
delboy1983 wrote:AlcoholBrazil wrote:delboy1983 wrote:What time is your flight out of here Hillman to somewhere you are appreciated.
Brace yourself for Sterling to plummet if a Corbyn Government is on the cards.
Another dive for Sterling !!
m4rkb wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:Think carefully...
If you vote Tory, you will NOT be "Getting Brexit Done".
That is for 2020 and there must be an 80% chance of it resulting in a no deal exit.
Which will disable our economy for generations.
One of the MANY issues not discussed ( or on my town's case, discussed by our MP who demonstrated his failure to understand) is that :
WE NEED an EU deal. It represents half our current trade. No deal would cause massive damage to certain industries, agriculture and fisheries amongst them.
But the EU will not let us trade as we are now once we are not members. They WILL , though , expect any of our exports to comply with regulation ( though that will be regulation we will have no say in, and which most critically will expose services exports). Tariffs are far less of an issue. Paperwork, once outside the customs union, will absorb much resource and be enough to prevent some small firms from even trying to.
So even if we got a deal, we could never get anywhere like the level of business we have now.
SO we would need another substantial trade deal. Forget ANZAC- peanuts and already sewn up by China. Forget China; Germany is already their top partner ( EU member or not).
NO it is the US. But the regulation- or lack of it- that the US would expect would directly conflict with that which the EU expects. GM foods would be one small example.
THEY ARE INCOMPATIBLE.
So there is NO WAY we can do both. There is NO WAY we can even do either in one year, unless we roll over and accept all their demands. Whatever route unfolds, economic disaster awaits.
Another post where someone 'fails to understand'.
If you know so much why don't you get into politics and stand for election yourself.
I hear there are plenty of vacancies in the Monster Raving Loony Party
m4rkb wrote:Labour is now the childrens' party. They're the only ones daft enough and gullible enough to vote for it who aren't old enough to know better.
.. and hardline commies wearing utilitarian hats.
subsub wrote:m4rkb wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:Think carefully...
If you vote Tory, you will NOT be "Getting Brexit Done".
That is for 2020 and there must be an 80% chance of it resulting in a no deal exit.
Which will disable our economy for generations.
One of the MANY issues not discussed ( or on my town's case, discussed by our MP who demonstrated his failure to understand) is that :
WE NEED an EU deal. It represents half our current trade. No deal would cause massive damage to certain industries, agriculture and fisheries amongst them.
But the EU will not let us trade as we are now once we are not members. They WILL , though , expect any of our exports to comply with regulation ( though that will be regulation we will have no say in, and which most critically will expose services exports). Tariffs are far less of an issue. Paperwork, once outside the customs union, will absorb much resource and be enough to prevent some small firms from even trying to.
So even if we got a deal, we could never get anywhere like the level of business we have now.
SO we would need another substantial trade deal. Forget ANZAC- peanuts and already sewn up by China. Forget China; Germany is already their top partner ( EU member or not).
NO it is the US. But the regulation- or lack of it- that the US would expect would directly conflict with that which the EU expects. GM foods would be one small example.
THEY ARE INCOMPATIBLE.
So there is NO WAY we can do both. There is NO WAY we can even do either in one year, unless we roll over and accept all their demands. Whatever route unfolds, economic disaster awaits.
Another post where someone 'fails to understand'.
If you know so much why don't you get into politics and stand for election yourself.
I hear there are plenty of vacancies in the Monster Raving Loony Party
I note that neither you nor Roy have actually addressed any of the points Hillman made.
I wonder why…
Roy Twing wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:Think carefully...
If you vote Tory, you will NOT be "Getting Brexit Done".
That is for 2020 and there must be an 80% chance of it resulting in a no deal exit.
Which will disable our economy for generations.
One of the MANY issues not discussed ( or on my town's case, discussed by our MP who demonstrated his failure to understand) is that :
WE NEED an EU deal. It represents half our current trade. No deal would cause massive damage to certain industries, agriculture and fisheries amongst them.
But the EU will not let us trade as we are now once we are not members. They WILL , though , expect any of our exports to comply with regulation ( though that will be regulation we will have no say in, and which most critically will expose services exports). Tariffs are far less of an issue. Paperwork, once outside the customs union, will absorb much resource and be enough to prevent some small firms from even trying to.
So even if we got a deal, we could never get anywhere like the level of business we have now.
SO we would need another substantial trade deal. Forget ANZAC- peanuts and already sewn up by China. Forget China; Germany is already their top partner ( EU member or not).
NO it is the US. But the regulation- or lack of it- that the US would expect would directly conflict with that which the EU expects. GM foods would be one small example.
THEY ARE INCOMPATIBLE.
So there is NO WAY we can do both. There is NO WAY we can even do either in one year, unless we roll over and accept all their demands. Whatever route unfolds, economic disaster awaits.
The above was a party political broadcast on behalf of the ant-brexit; anti-democracy; & sour grapes parties.
AlcoholBrazil wrote:delboy1983 wrote:What time is your flight out of here Hillman to somewhere you are appreciated.
Brace yourself for Sterling to plummet if a Corbyn Government is on the cards.