Yorkshire Massively Racist Cricket Club

[Salem]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

[subsub]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

[Salem]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

Can't speak for Zambo or Holden , but personally I don't think it's right that a man's career should be destroyed on the words of a racist .

[Jonathan]

Well said Monty.

https://wisden.com/stories/racism-in-en ... el-vaughan

Holden, do you think that Vaughan should be on air, commenting on a subject he's been implicated in?

No, he should be commenting on cricket matches until proven guilty.

But most businesses suspend employees while an investigation has taken place, rather than let them continue to work, so what the BBC has done is by the book – why can't you understand that?

They don’t want to understand Subs. It’s patently obvious that is what happens.

[Holden Mcgroyne]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

You know as well as I do that any investigation will be a waste of time. There’s no smoking gun and it will always be one mans word against the other.

Vaughan should be in the commentary box alongside Stuart Broad.

[subsub]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

Can't speak for Zambo or Holden , but personally I don't think it's right that a man's career should be destroyed on the words of a racist .

Rafiq's anti-semitic comments were totally out of order, and he has rightly apologised for them, but that doesn't mean that the systematic racist abuse he received at Yorkshire should be ignored, as you and others seem very keen to do.

I also note that you've completely ducked my question about whether you understand the point about Vaughan being suspended rather than sacked.

[Salem]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

Can't speak for Zambo or Holden , but personally I don't think it's right that a man's career should be destroyed on the words of a racist .

Rafiq's anti-semitic comments were totally out of order, and he has rightly apologised for them, but that doesn't mean that the systematic racist abuse he received at Yorkshire should be ignored, as you and others seem very keen to do.

I also note that you've completely ducked my question about whether you understand the point about Vaughan being suspended rather than sacked.

So Rafiq has apologised for his racist comments and that's OK ? Yet Vaughan denies ever saying what he's been accused of but must be investigated . Fucking laughable.

No one here is saying that IF it's proved that Rafiq did indeed suffer racist abuse , it should be ignored . Of course it shouldn't. But all we have at the moment is heresay . One word against another .

[subsub]

In this day and age of 'cancellation' , it's good to see Fox Sports still hold the innocent until proved guilty line by keeping Vaughan in their commentary line up

I've seen this 'innocent until proven guilty' line parroted so many times on social media, but while that's applicable in court, it's different with businesses, where employees are suspended while an investigation takes place.
I'm genuinely baffled why you, Zambo and Holden seem to struggle with this?

Can't speak for Zambo or Holden , but personally I don't think it's right that a man's career should be destroyed on the words of a racist .

Rafiq's anti-semitic comments were totally out of order, and he has rightly apologised for them, but that doesn't mean that the systematic racist abuse he received at Yorkshire should be ignored, as you and others seem very keen to do.

I also note that you've completely ducked my question about whether you understand the point about Vaughan being suspended rather than sacked.

So Rafiq has apologised for his racist comments and that's OK ? Yet Vaughan denies ever saying what he's been accused of but must be investigated . Fucking laughable.

No one here is saying that IF it's proved that Rafiq did indeed suffer racist abuse , it should be ignored . Of course it shouldn't. But all we have at the moment is heresay . One word against another .

Except that three separate people all claim to have heard what Vaughan is alleged to have said. So it's not one word against another.

[carcinogen]

Come on. Vaughn is a prick. Racist or not, he's just a d1ckhead. Th1ck. Just looking at his past Tweets confirms it. He's not intelligent enough to be a racist. Just a prat of the highest order. Not that that forgives him. But he's just a bit dim. I think we all fall into the trap sometimes that if someone is on telly we immediately think they are bright. They aren't. Especially sportsmen/women. Most of the time they have the reading age of 10 year olds.

[JudgeTedd]

Well said Monty.

https://wisden.com/stories/racism-in-en ... el-vaughan

Holden, do you think that Vaughan should be on air, commenting on a subject he's been implicated in?

No, he should be commenting on cricket matches until proven guilty.

But most businesses suspend employees while an investigation has taken place, rather than let them continue to work, so what the BBC has done is by the book – why can't you understand that?

They don’t want to understand Subs. It’s patently obvious that is what happens.

Exactly this. Taking Vaughan out of the firing line is just common sense. It’s really not hard to understand.

[Zambo]

It fits the BBC agenda like a glove.

I know, fancy them taking sensible precautions by not having an alleged racist present programmes for the time being...

It appears you have no idea of the meaning of 'alleged'.

Your opinion is prejudiced by your dislike for the accused, which you have admitted several times on this thread.

[subsub]

It fits the BBC agenda like a glove.

I know, fancy them taking sensible precautions by not having an alleged racist present programmes for the time being...

It appears you have no idea of the meaning of 'alleged'.

Your opinion is prejudiced by your dislike for the accused, which you have admitted several times on this thread.

As is yours by your hatred of the main organisation that Vaughan works for, which you have admitted on numerous times in this forum.

Once again, the BBC is doing what any sensible business would, and suspending someone pending the outcome of an investigation.

[Zambo]

It fits the BBC agenda like a glove.

I know, fancy them taking sensible precautions by not having an alleged racist present programmes for the time being...

It appears you have no idea of the meaning of 'alleged'.

Your opinion is prejudiced by your dislike for the accused, which you have admitted several times on this thread.

As is yours by your hatred of the main organisation that Vaughan works for, which you have admitted on numerous times in this forum.

Once again, the BBC is doing what any sensible business would, and suspending someone pending the outcome of an investigation.

If it was Lewis Hamilton you'd be having babies.

[subsub]

It fits the BBC agenda like a glove.

I know, fancy them taking sensible precautions by not having an alleged racist present programmes for the time being...

It appears you have no idea of the meaning of 'alleged'.

Your opinion is prejudiced by your dislike for the accused, which you have admitted several times on this thread.

As is yours by your hatred of the main organisation that Vaughan works for, which you have admitted on numerous times in this forum.

Once again, the BBC is doing what any sensible business would, and suspending someone pending the outcome of an investigation.

If it was Lewis Hamilton you'd be having babies.

I note that you're ducking the point every time, Zambo. Why is that?
Could it be that your irrational hatred of the BBC is clouding your judgment?

[henrycrs]

It fits the BBC agenda like a glove.

I know, fancy them taking sensible precautions by not having an alleged racist present programmes for the time being...

It appears you have no idea of the meaning of 'alleged'.

Your opinion is prejudiced by your dislike for the accused, which you have admitted several times on this thread.

As is yours by your hatred of the main organisation that Vaughan works for, which you have admitted on numerous times in this forum.

Once again, the BBC is doing what any sensible business would, and suspending someone pending the outcome of an investigation.

If it was Lewis Hamilton you'd be having babies.

I note that you're ducking the point every time, Zambo. Why is that?
Could it be that your irrational hatred of the BBC is clouding your judgment?

Does ANYONE like the BBC.

Morally corrupt, peado supporting cunts.