Neither am I, but let's not forget that RB ruthlessly exploited "the media" to get rich and famous. And to fuck anyone he wanted.
It was a bit weird when 30 year-old Ringo sang it.Holden Mcgroyne wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 6:56 pm Interesting choice for today's game
https://www.70s.heardledecades.com/
Been a while since she's been in the papers, I suspecttheleader82 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 9:03 pm Daniella Westbrook has defended brand. Anything to keep her name in the papers
The media have absolutely fucked it as usual. Brand is gaining sympathy every day this goes on from some quarters, and at the same time from others, he's already been tried and found guilty.Jonathan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 8:21 pm Brand comes across to me as an odious sort of bloke, not someone I would wish to have a drink with etc. but I’m not keen on this trial by media and it raises a few questions why. Not sure it will help him get a fair trial either which could put that in jeopardy.
Daniella's always sticking her nose in where she shouldn't.theleader82 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 9:03 pm Daniella Westbrook has defended brand. Anything to keep her name in the papers
Have they, though? This is the first story I've heard about RB in many a long year. Up until last week he was an irrelevance on the World Stage, if we're talking about his important views that will Break The Internet.
Welcome back Big P, you have been missedpaolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
Not much nose leftThe Tick wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:09 amDaniella's always sticking her nose in where she shouldn't.theleader82 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 9:03 pm Daniella Westbrook has defended brand. Anything to keep her name in the papers
How sadly predictablepaolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
It reminds me how they went after Alex belfield for exposing the bbcSunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:29 pmHow sadly predictablepaolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
That you would turn out for this arrogant buffoon.
By all means give him due process but FFS don't make him out to be a martyr.
He's had a good run selling drivel to the gullible.
If he hadn't someone else would have done.
Who's "they"?theleader82 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:47 pmIt reminds me how they went after Alex belfield for exposing the bbcSunbeam Alpine wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:29 pmHow sadly predictablepaolo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 21, 2023 9:18 am whatever comes from the brand - outing
his voice will be silenced
charged or not, no msm will be obliged to have him on again
did he do it, did he not...seems like his behaviour was grim at best
if he did bad things....face twelve peers and take your medicine
maybe it's like mi6, mossad, epstein.....we'll keep this for a rainy day
the way he foisted truths on america recently made execs very uncomfortable as he presented their own facts back to them
he knew he would be targeted and that must be pressure, especially if you have previous, more so if it's bad
they have been after him for a while now, and you don't go against msm's controllers, big pharma, black rock, vanguard et al without consequences
and there aint many of us, public or private without skeletons....
That you would turn out for this arrogant buffoon.
By all means give him due process but FFS don't make him out to be a martyr.
He's had a good run selling drivel to the gullible.
If he hadn't someone else would have done.
