Fox has lost his libel case for calling people peedo on Twitter. I'm sure he'll blame a bias media and woke judges.
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:07 pm
by Sunbeam Alpine
Great
Of course all judges are paedos. It's a fact
It displays the greatness of the man that he isn't too proud to pick up the all-purpose paedo label so beloved of so many.
When the great majority of them have not a clue what it means but it sounds good.
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:16 pm
by antdad
Oh dear, not happening for poor old Loza. Lost job and now court case.
Freedom isn't free, it cost's a hefty fucking fee...
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:21 pm
by The Tick
How long before lawrence fox is found in epping forest with bloodied wrists?
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:30 pm
by kancutlawns
The Tick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:21 pm
How long before lawrence fox is found in epping forest with bloodied wrists?
Wherever floats his boat.
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:33 pm
by Zambo
If you are going to call anyone anything which defames, make sure you have some proof ffs.
At least don't be stupid enough to plead not guilty if you haven't
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:48 pm
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
Or have musk-level pockets
Re: Laurence Fox libel
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:17 pm
by carcinogen
He should pled insanity. Anyone who dips their wick inside of a Gallagher girl is clearly nuts.
I was about to draw that exact comparison, but you got there ahead of me.
The difference is that Foxy's trial was held in Britain, judged on the basis of what a reasonable person might infer, whereas in the US it's "Brits are the Baddies" and we'll pretend to believe that calling a Brit a paedo is "banter".