Piers Morgan going to YouTube

[The Ghost of Alex Higgins]

He's so Durham

[carcinogen]

If Markle had played with his button mushroom the world be such a happy place right now.

[lambrini]

LOL

[carcinogen]

The amount of money Murdoch Inc. pumped into TalkTV only for it to get a 0.01 percent of audience share is quite shameful really. Even the bloke who owns/runs GB News has turned down at least two offers from Murdoch.

[lambrini]

The amount of money Murdoch Inc. pumped into TalkTV only for it to get a 0.01 percent of audience share is quite shameful really. Even the bloke who owns/runs GB News has turned down at least two offers from Murdoch.

+1

[JimmyDee]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

[rorymac]

All seem to turn halfwit when they get some recognition .. mountains of intellectual one trick ponies and tossers. The human condition is retarded round and round !
Need a higher power

[subsub]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

No, I disagree. Lineker does it because he genuinely believes what he posts; Morgan will say anything required to put himself in the spotlight.
Morgan doesn't actually believe half the shite he posts – he posts stuff he knows will get attention, which is tragic.

[lambrini]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

No, I disagree. Lineker does it because he genuinely believes what he posts; Morgan will say anything required to put himself in the spotlight.
Morgan doesn't actually believe half the shite he posts – he posts stuff he knows will get attention, which is tragic.

It seems to me that Lineker doesn’t believe in what he posts either. People like him and Morgan are willing to jump on any bandwagon where the money is. Don’t be fooled. It's all about the money, honey, as well as fame and attention. Windbags need to feel relevant.

[lambrini]

All seem to turn halfwit when they get some recognition .. mountains of intellectual one trick ponies and tossers. The human condition is retarded round and round !
Need a higher power

'It's all b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t – bullshit, folks!'

Where's George Carlin when we need him?

[subsub]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

No, I disagree. Lineker does it because he genuinely believes what he posts; Morgan will say anything required to put himself in the spotlight.
Morgan doesn't actually believe half the shite he posts – he posts stuff he knows will get attention, which is tragic.

It seems to me that Lineker doesn’t believe in what he posts either. People like him and Morgan are willing to jump on any bandwagon where the money is. Don’t be fooled. It's all about the money, honey, as well as fame and attention. Windbags need to feel relevant.

Well, who knows? Lineker seems a vaguely decent chap (marital indiscretions notwithstanding) who is socially aware and has his head screwed on the right way.
Morgan is a very smart chap but seems to throw all his energies into putting himself in the limelight and is desperate to be talked about. He seems to crave the attention far more than Lineker does.

[The Ghost of Alex Higgins]

The boy lineacre is a snidey little shitcunt weasel and an odious toad to boot

[Zambo]

The boy lineacre is a snidey little shitcunt weasel and an odious toad to boot

And that's letting him off the hook.

[Sunbeam Alpine]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

No, I disagree. Lineker does it because he genuinely believes what he posts; Morgan will say anything required to put himself in the spotlight.
Morgan doesn't actually believe half the shite he posts – he posts stuff he knows will get attention, which is tragic.

It seems to me that Lineker doesn’t believe in what he posts either. People like him and Morgan are willing to jump on any bandwagon where the money is. Don’t be fooled. It's all about the money, honey, as well as fame and attention. Windbags need to feel relevant.

Hmm
And your evidence is?
So why would he make himself a target for abuse, as he has done, and risk his income, to post stuff he doesn't believe him?
And in what way does him doing what he does make him different from people like Rees-Mogg using his (paid) time on TV to spout what he does? BTW he has a job already that we pay for.

[Sid Pervcat]

He can’t just follow [Arsenal], he has to try to irritate other people while doing so.

And that, in a nutshell, is why all of those "celebrity content-providers" are loathsome despicable twats.
It's all for clicks and likes and dislikes and argumentative replies, to make their post "trend".

Yes, Lineker; you're playing the same game. Don't pretend that you're any different.

No, I disagree. Lineker does it because he genuinely believes what he posts; Morgan will say anything required to put himself in the spotlight.
Morgan doesn't actually believe half the shite he posts – he posts stuff he knows will get attention, which is tragic.

It seems to me that Lineker doesn’t believe in what he posts either. People like him and Morgan are willing to jump on any bandwagon where the money is. Don’t be fooled. It's all about the money, honey, as well as fame and attention. Windbags need to feel relevant.

Hmm
And your evidence is?
So why would he make himself a target for abuse, as he has done, and risk his income, to post stuff he doesn't believe him?
And in what way does him doing what he does make him different from people like Rees-Mogg using his (paid) time on TV to spout what he does? BTW he has a job already that we pay for.

Why don't YOU tell US Mein Hillmütt?