Puberty blockers banned

In-depth debate on all topical issues
User avatar
The Ghost of Alex Higgins
No longer the Bridesmaid
Posts: 39307
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Location: Cunt
Contact:

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by The Ghost of Alex Higgins »

How many bailiwick bros still got t'acorn hoody?
MAKING TALKFORUM GREAT AGAIN

User avatar
lambrini
Registered user
Posts: 16113
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by lambrini »

The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 3:30 pm How many bailiwick bros still got t'acorn hoody?
Angels and Airwaves

Noooo 😭 @Sadact7

( ◡‿◡ )
POTY 2023 & 2022 finalist
*
Treat me right
I'm still a good man's daughter
Let me in if I break
And be quiet if I shatter

User avatar
henrycrs
Registered user
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:04 pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by henrycrs »

Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman

Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.

Leave the kids alone.

User avatar
chelseachelsea
Registered user
Posts: 2936
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 7:06 pm
Location: London

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by chelseachelsea »

henrycrs wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 pm Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman

Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.

Leave the kids alone.
+1

User avatar
lambrini
Registered user
Posts: 16113
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by lambrini »

henrycrs wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 7:54 pm Cock (have one or ever had one) = man
No cock = woman

Puberty blocking shit is as bad as child abuse.

Leave the kids alone.
Exactly.

I truly feel sorry for kids these days.
( ◡‿◡ )
POTY 2023 & 2022 finalist
*
Treat me right
I'm still a good man's daughter
Let me in if I break
And be quiet if I shatter

Sunbeam Alpine
Registered user
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 4:17 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by Sunbeam Alpine »

I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.

User avatar
Vespa
Registered user
Posts: 20010
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:37 am

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by Vespa »

Sunbeam Alpine wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:19 pm I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.
I think most people would agree changing the physiological structure of a child is wrong.

User avatar
antdad
Registered user
Posts: 6488
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:16 am

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by antdad »

lambrini wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 1:48 pm But, I digress... My point is, children (U18 in the UK) should never undergo surgical alterations, nor should they be hastily diagnosed as 'trans' without careful consideration of the circumstances I outlined above.
The don't and never have in the UK and when they have gone on to surgeries it's still as it should be incredibly rare.

User avatar
lambrini
Registered user
Posts: 16113
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by lambrini »

Sunbeam Alpine wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2024 9:19 pm I don't think you ( or I) have the faintest idea of how these things are done.
All due respect, but you are beyond mad, Hillman.
( ◡‿◡ )
POTY 2023 & 2022 finalist
*
Treat me right
I'm still a good man's daughter
Let me in if I break
And be quiet if I shatter

Sunbeam Alpine
Registered user
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 4:17 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by Sunbeam Alpine »

You would know..

Your opinion is always right...anyone else is ideologically-driven ( or Mad). It doesn't occur to you that some of the negative views expressed here might also be ideological, does it?

Recently you told us that one of the ( apparently , for you) wrong things about nationalisation is the emergence of unions ( which , of course, must always be BAD).

Funny thing is that most train companies have had stoppages in the last week. THEY ARE UNIONISED.

The massively better European transport systems are largely nationalised, and universally unionised. And yet....

So are most of the German businesses that beat the pants off their UK competitors. Something to do with German managers being grown-up , seeing the benefit of unions, and NOT IDEOLOGICALLY DRIVEN.

User avatar
The Tick
Registered user
Posts: 12984
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by The Tick »

Ultimately this is a case of physically altering a child through use of hormones, which can have harmful medical consequences.

A child isn't of sound enough mind to make such decisions regarding their physical health.

User avatar
Sid Pervcat
Registered user
Posts: 26885
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:43 am
Location: Turbo Island

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by Sid Pervcat »

Sunbeam Alpine wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am You would know..

Your opinion is always right...anyone else is ideologically-driven ( or Mad). It doesn't occur to you that some of the negative views expressed here might also be ideological, does it?

Recently you told us that one of the ( apparently , for you) wrong things about nationalisation is the emergence of unions ( which , of course, must always be BAD).

Funny thing is that most train companies have had stoppages in the last week. THEY ARE UNIONISED.

The massively better European transport systems are largely nationalised, and universally unionised. And yet....

So are most of the German businesses that beat the pants off their UK competitors. Something to do with German managers being grown-up , seeing the benefit of unions, and NOT IDEOLOGICALLY DRIVEN.

Not quite sure what this has to do with Puberty Blockers, but err.....yeah, whatevs
05.02.2024

User avatar
antdad
Registered user
Posts: 6488
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:16 am

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by antdad »

Cass actually said this morning on R4 (8.33am) the use of hormones was safe when used to treat other conditions like precocious puberty but the results were lesser known for the treatment for gender dysphoria so they will go back to using a research based protocol.

A child was and will never have made the decision to undergo treatment unilaterly, that's a fundamental misunderstanding of the process. For some the medical pathway will be the correct one no matter what the objection, transphobic or otherwise.

Sunbeam Alpine
Registered user
Posts: 2374
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2021 4:17 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by Sunbeam Alpine »

Agreed

User avatar
lambrini
Registered user
Posts: 16113
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Puberty blockers banned

Post by lambrini »

The Tick wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:46 am Ultimately this is a case of physically altering a child through use of hormones, which can have harmful medical consequences.

A child isn't of sound enough mind to make such decisions regarding their physical health.
+1
( ◡‿◡ )
POTY 2023 & 2022 finalist
*
Treat me right
I'm still a good man's daughter
Let me in if I break
And be quiet if I shatter

Post Reply