talkFORUM

m4rkb wrote:No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

m4rkb wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.

I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.

By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!

Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!

The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.

No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

Boris Johnson should get on with implementing the better deal he promised during the referendum campaign.

m4rkb wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.

I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.

By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!

Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!

The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.

No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

But we were already in the EU so that's hardly the same thing.
So we would have stayed the same anyway.

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.

I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.

By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!

Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!

The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.

No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

But we were already in the EU so that's hardly the same thing.
So we would have stayed the same anyway.

Would Brexiter politicians have 'accepted the result' if they’d lost. Of course not.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m-36306681

Ralph wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.

I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.

By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!

Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!

The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.

No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

But we were already in the EU so that's hardly the same thing.
So we would have stayed the same anyway.

Would Brexiter politicians have 'accepted the result' if they’d lost. Of course not.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m-36306681

Exactly.

subsub wrote:

paolo wrote:Myth or troof

Harry and slice gibbing off serving as s warning

More tittle shots and a rumoured vid and it ain’t Morris dancing

Please be true as we hope and pray Trudeau did not a 17 year old whilst being a teacher.... please lord let it be male

Conspire

Lizard peninsula

Tina

Can you rewrite your post, but in proper sentences, please?

Sorry subbles, late night plus Shiite iPhone it’s the best I can do

Hillman avenger wrote:

subsub wrote:

paolo wrote:Myth or troof

Harry and slice gibbing off serving as s warning

More tittle shots and a rumoured vid and it ain’t Morris dancing

Please be true as we hope and pray Trudeau did not a 17 year old whilst being a teacher.... please lord let it be male

Conspire

Lizard peninsula

Tina

Can you rewrite your post, but in proper sentences, please?

Not sure that would help

Atta Scouse

paolo wrote:

subsub wrote:

paolo wrote:Myth or troof

Harry and slice gibbing off serving as s warning

More tittle shots and a rumoured vid and it ain’t Morris dancing

Please be true as we hope and pray Trudeau did not a 17 year old whilst being a teacher.... please lord let it be male

Conspire

Lizard peninsula

Tina

Can you rewrite your post, but in proper sentences, please?

Sorry subbles, late night plus Shiite iPhone it’s the best I can do

Fair enough.

paolo wrote:

subsub wrote:

paolo wrote:Myth or troof

Harry and slice gibbing off serving as s warning

More tittle shots and a rumoured vid and it ain’t Morris dancing

Please be true as we hope and pray Trudeau did not a 17 year old whilst being a teacher.... please lord let it be male

Conspire

Lizard peninsula

Tina

Can you rewrite your post, but in proper sentences, please?

Sorry subbles, late night plus Shiite iPhone it’s the best I can do

The best thing to do is put the phone away and try again in the morning.

JudgeTedd wrote:

paolo wrote:

subsub wrote:

paolo wrote:Myth or troof

Harry and slice gibbing off serving as s warning

More tittle shots and a rumoured vid and it ain’t Morris dancing

Please be true as we hope and pray Trudeau did not a 17 year old whilst being a teacher.... please lord let it be male

Conspire

Lizard peninsula

Tina

Can you rewrite your post, but in proper sentences, please?

Sorry subbles, late night plus Shiite iPhone it’s the best I can do

The best thing to do is put the phone away and try again in the morning.

We lol try my way hone aga in the morning:-)

Don't trouble yourself

My Scouse

Hillman avenger wrote:Don't trouble yourself

subsub wrote:

Ralph wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

subsub wrote:

m4rkb wrote:

Ralph wrote:Letting people have a vote on whether they want a no deal Brexit would be a fantastic exercise in democracy. Ploughing ahead with a no deal Brexit without consulting the people would be the opposite.

I don't know if you noticed but we had one, any you lost.

By rights, you shouldn't even have a voice on the matter as, to restate it, - you lost!

Ah, the classic Leaver's retort:
YOU LOST! YOU LOST!

The referendum was only advisory, anyway. Wish you'd understand that.

No it wasn't. There was a distinct promise to implement the result.
Would it have been advisory if remain had won? I don't think so.

But we were already in the EU so that's hardly the same thing.
So we would have stayed the same anyway.

Would Brexiter politicians have 'accepted the result' if they’d lost. Of course not.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics- ... m-36306681

Exactly.

Difference being though, is that if 'remain' won, - they'd have instantly been rewarded with the spoils of their victory, - we've waited more than 3 years without.

On reflection, this question I posted on the pointless flurry that is the brexit thread might be better placed here:

"To slightly digress from the pages after pages of the same old same old, - I vaguely recall (pre brexit) facts & figures regarding dozens of EU laws made, which affect the UK, but which the UK government tried to prevent and failed.
Struggling to find details of the topic this morning, but if (still) true in these ever changing times, it would go some way to dispel the remainer attempts to pretend that the EU is a benign body that always gives its members a veto."

In other words, was all of the reports of britain being overruled regarding dozens of EU laws true, or myth?

Boris Johnson taking the country out of the EU with no trade deal after promising a better deal is the equivalent of Remain winning and then claiming a mandate to join the Euro - 'We voted to Remain!'

Boris Johnson and the establishment have a mandate to deliver what they promised in order to win the referendum. Nothing else. If they can’t deliver the BETTER deal they promised we have a problem.