Page 16 of 17

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:38 pm
by Royal24s
Isn't there a special forum called pandemonium for half wits to post and counter post insults they'd be scared to say in real life ?
I'm sure this is a useful outlet for them, but why do they keep doing it here ?
Would the moderators consider a special thread here just for them to post mindless digs ?
We could take it in turns to post something in there so they could make Kevin and Perry comments about it for a page or two then someone else writes one for them to target for a bit and so on...

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 9:44 pm
by carcinogen
This fat twat didn't have it in him to fuck anything. Fucks sake.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 10:05 pm
by kancutlawns
Zambo wrote:
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:Yes, Ted is a mod here



How come she’s being kept in power? She’s a chronic diabetic and is a woman of 66 who clearly hasn’t got the mental or physical capability to serve the country with any semblance of competence. The Tories really are a bunch of infeeling, mercenary bastards.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:30 am
by carcinogen
kancutlawns wrote:
Zambo wrote:
The Ghost of Alex Higgins wrote:Yes, Ted is a mod here



How come she’s being kept in power? She’s a chronic diabetic and is a woman of 66 who clearly hasn’t got the mental or physical capability to serve the country with any semblance of competence. The Tories really are a bunch of infeeling, mercenary bastards.


More worryingly, wy would a decent, morally-upstanding, educated, clean-living woman want to be Prime Minister? It doesn't make sense to me. To be Prime Minister you have to be a rotten cunt. Like Boris, or Blair etc.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:53 am
by kancutlawns
She was a shithouse as Home Secretary, hasn’t any convictions and was bundled out of the back door when she comprehensively fucked up the PR at Grenfell. She called an election which saw the cunty party reduce their majority. She went cap in hand with a party in NI with terrorist links after saying there was no money tree. She’s fucked this country over with Brexit and is giving the likes of Barnier and Merkel a right old laugh with her uncertainty.

And you think she’s a decent human being? She’s a utter disgrace. Carc, we know you’re turned on by her grey hair, stuttering and self pity and would like to stick it up her stinkpipe but do you seriously think she has the credentials you’ve said?

I don’t think calling her out for the piece of work she is is an indication of being “small dicked”.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:14 pm
by paolo
Steve Hunt wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:49 am Hillman - you know my thoughts on Heath.

You know that I met him once.

I am not into huge conspiracy theories. But, having met him (and also, many years ago, being pretty high up in the FCS once), I simply do not believe that Heath is innocent.
The re visit

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:29 pm
by paolo
Hillman avenger wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:57 pm
Rossco wrote:Most governments are full of sexual predators and pedos. How they get them to do their bidding. If not bought off, then blackmailed. But most of these sick fucks enjoy causing pain anyhow.

And yes I said most not all.
Where do you get this shit from?
And so it came to pass

Great thread with brilliant input from mark, marky and royals24

And hillman

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:07 pm
by lambrini
"And you think she’s a decent human being? She’s a utter disgrace. Carc, we know you’re turned on by her grey hair, stuttering and self pity and would like to stick it up her stinkpipe but do you seriously think she has the credentials you’ve said?"

You seem nice. Why resort to personal insults, Lawns? Carc's preferences have nothing to do with the argument. Even if he found May attractive, so what? You'd like to bum Vanessa Feltz. Big yikes. Huge.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:31 pm
by kancutlawns
With an impending sense of doom and expecting a verbose, italicised cliche ridden response replete with a c&p’d text from a dead old git, why are you replying to a post from nearly six and a half years ago? smh .

That post if I can be bothered to do a superficial critique on doesn’t even have anything to do with Edward Heath.

Sort it out luv.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:17 pm
by paolo
kancutlawns wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:31 pm With an impending sense of doom and expecting a verbose, italicised cliche ridden response replete with a c&p’d text from a dead old git, why are you replying to a post from nearly six and a half years ago? smh .

That post if I can be bothered to do a superficial critique on doesn’t even have anything to do with Edward Heath.

Sort it out luv.
I think it's because the subject matter was being discussed, and upon realising that a very interesting thread on the subject matter existed, with some great posters contributing, the old thread was brought back to the fore

It was then commented on

in a world of noncing used to further power, and with an evil prime minister that was corrupted into signing on to the EEC, it's probably quite relevant

history doesnt die when perps die

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:19 pm
by paolo
lambrini wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:07 pm "And you think she’s a decent human being? She’s a utter disgrace. Carc, we know you’re turned on by her grey hair, stuttering and self pity and would like to stick it up her stinkpipe but do you seriously think she has the credentials you’ve said?"

You seem nice. Why resort to personal insults, Lawns? Carc's preferences have nothing to do with the argument. Even if he found May attractive, so what? You'd like to bum Vanessa Feltz. Big yikes. Huge.
pretty well said, regarding may

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:34 pm
by kancutlawns
🤣🤣🤣 Don’t think anyone’s that desperate.

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 11:37 pm
by lambrini
[Input prompt] : Hi, KankBot-GPT! Generate a short paragraph in the style of a ranty simp with text-to-speech Jeremy Kyle.
kancutlawns wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 7:31 pm With an impending sense of doom and expecting a verbose, italicised cliche ridden response replete with a c&p’d text from a dead old git, why are you replying to a post from nearly six and a half years ago? smh .

That post if I can be bothered to do a superficial critique on doesn’t even have anything to do with Edward Heath.

Sort it out luv.
LOL.

You haven’t got a clue what you're talking about, Lawns, as usual. It's shame to see you brush off my valid point using your cheap gaslighting gimp simp act again. Oh, well, nevermind. Happy new year, old boy! All the best and all that.

Image

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 1:00 am
by paolo
kancutlawns wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:34 pm 🤣🤣🤣 Don’t think anyone’s that desperate.
some of us have our moments!!

Re: Ted Heath

Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2024 8:12 am
by The Ghost of Alex Higgins
I'll go to the outer limits, but FeltzundMay is a bridge too far