The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
And you are making out all foodbank users are fucking angels who have hit hard times.
The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
finchman wrote:The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
And you are making out all foodbank users are fucking angels who have hit hard times.
Hillman avenger wrote:finchman wrote:The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
And you are making out all foodbank users are fucking angels who have hit hard times.
No he isn't.
Why can't you accept that there will always be some who abuse things? We hate them as much as you do.
That's why the requirement for a social worker reference was introduced.
I don't get why everything and everybody is a target for your hate.
Hillman avenger wrote: Why can't you accept that there will always be some who abuse things? We hate them as much as you do.
Hillman avenger wrote:Steve Hunt wrote:Hillman avenger wrote: This in the fifth richest country in the world.
Just checked.
We appear to be 27th:
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j ... HUOcyn46Vg
Seems to depend on who counts it and how
http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com/
Whatever the true position, there is no way we can describe ourselves as poor.
What we do have is an enormous range in wealth, and I will save R24s the bother of telling me that is because I am jealous of "people who have succeeded". For the reasons that (a) I am not in the slightest jealous, and very happy with what I have achieved and earned; and (b) because wealth is not necessarily earned.
It is, for me, indefensible that in a country of our wealth, people who work still need food banks.
finchman wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:finchman wrote:The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
And you are making out all foodbank users are fucking angels who have hit hard times.
No he isn't.
Why can't you accept that there will always be some who abuse things? We hate them as much as you do.
That's why the requirement for a social worker reference was introduced.
I don't get why everything and everybody is a target for your hate.
1...Yes he is.
2...I do, who's we?
3...Oh really?
4...Thats a sweeping generalisation.
Zambo wrote:Keep it up Tick, the more you abuse posters because they disagree with, you the sooner we can get shot of you. How long was the last ban?
The Tick wrote:Zambo wrote:Keep it up Tick, the more you abuse posters because they disagree with, you the sooner we can get shot of you. How long was the last ban?
Bitter washed up ex mod still thinks he's relevant to anything.
My last ban was shorter than your last ban, incidentally.
Zambo wrote:The Tick wrote:Zambo wrote:Keep it up Tick, the more you abuse posters because they disagree with, you the sooner we can get shot of you. How long was the last ban?
Bitter washed up ex mod still thinks he's relevant to anything.
My last ban was shorter than your last ban, incidentally.
You shouldn't be on here now after calling a poster's mother a dog after coming back from a ban. You are very fortunate you have tolerant mods, but we'll see how it pans out.
The Tick wrote:finchman wrote:Hillman avenger wrote:finchman wrote:The Tick wrote:He was making out all food bank users to be welfare abusers
And you are making out all foodbank users are fucking angels who have hit hard times.
No he isn't.
Why can't you accept that there will always be some who abuse things? We hate them as much as you do.
That's why the requirement for a social worker reference was introduced.
I don't get why everything and everybody is a target for your hate.
1...Yes he is.
2...I do, who's we?
3...Oh really?
4...Thats a sweeping generalisation.
1. No I am not.
2,3,4. Just shut up you mong.
Zambo wrote:Yep, abuse someone who doesn't agree with them. Lucky he hasn't started on your family yet.