ISIS Brides

In-depth debate on all topical issues
Post Reply
User avatar
kancutlawns
Posts: 40000
Posts: 51540
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:37 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by kancutlawns »

Just been ruled that Begun is not allowed back in the country to fight her citizenship.

User avatar
Holden Mcgroyne
Registered user
Posts: 10397
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 2:13 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Holden Mcgroyne »

Image
There's no poem, just prose.

User avatar
delboy1983
Registered user
Posts: 17972
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by delboy1983 »

Excellent .If she has a bed to make she should lie in it.
We're just two lost souls
Swimming in a fish bowl
Year after year

User avatar
Zambo
Registered user
Posts: 26041
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:18 am
Location: VAR office

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Zambo »

Someone with a backbone in the Supreme Court for a change then. Pity the Court of Appeal hadn't got one. It would quite clearly have been a security risk.

“radicalisation and desensitisation” to violence that Ms Begum underwent in Syria - illustrated by her comments in an interview that the sight of severed heads “didn’t faze” her - meant she still presented a danger to the public.

She had similarly continued to live under Isil rule “until the very end” and wanted the caliphate to be victorious.
When your heart is blue, there is nothing you can do. Keep Right On

User avatar
Zippy
Registered user
Posts: 6319
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 3:30 am
Location: London

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Zippy »

The right decision. She's still dangerous.
"talkFORUM royalty" - thursty.
"Talkforum's Alan Whicker! " - kevin04.
"Cunt" - sjbarca

User avatar
Sid Pervcat
Registered user
Posts: 26974
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:43 am
Location: Turbo Island

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Sid Pervcat »

kancutlawns wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:57 am Just been ruled that Begun is not allowed back in the country to fight her citizenship.
Good.
The fucking piece of shit.
05.02.2024

User avatar
delboy1983
Registered user
Posts: 17972
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by delboy1983 »

There is no upside to allow her back.
Would be a trial and considerable jail sentence
She would get legal aid
This would cost a lot of money.
This way -no cost
We're just two lost souls
Swimming in a fish bowl
Year after year

User avatar
kancutlawns
Posts: 40000
Posts: 51540
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:37 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by kancutlawns »

Totally understand it from a security perspective. Generally widely accepted.

User avatar
Zambo
Registered user
Posts: 26041
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:18 am
Location: VAR office

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Zambo »

delboy1983 wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:12 pm There is no upside to allow her back.
Would be a trial and considerable jail sentence
She would get legal aid
This would cost a lot of money.
This way -no cost
Her lawyers have been paid by the British taxpayer.
When your heart is blue, there is nothing you can do. Keep Right On

User avatar
delboy1983
Registered user
Posts: 17972
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by delboy1983 »

Zambo wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:43 pm
delboy1983 wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:12 pm There is no upside to allow her back.
Would be a trial and considerable jail sentence
She would get legal aid
This would cost a lot of money.
This way -no cost
Her lawyers have been paid by the British taxpayer.
We are so soft.The media will have been paying her as well for her comments.
We're just two lost souls
Swimming in a fish bowl
Year after year

User avatar
shabbado
Registered user
Posts: 11679
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:42 pm

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by shabbado »

delboy1983 wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:12 pm There is no upside to allow her back.
Would be a trial and considerable jail sentence
She would get legal aid
This would cost a lot of money.
This way -no cost
Why waste the money on shite like her when we can spend it on a 'world beating' track and trace system or give it to Matt Hancock's publican neighbour
A joyless arsehole.

User avatar
Sadact7
Registered user
Posts: 17145
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Highland, TX

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Sadact7 »

Bring her back just so she can be chucked straight in the fucking bin (Laden)
Oh Five - Oh Two - Twenty Four

In a bit Foam Moe

User avatar
paolo
Registered user
Posts: 13025
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Van Isle/Holmfirth/Verona

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by paolo »

just a poor, misguided innocent

bring her back for her career and contibution

i mean to pump out more sprogs, claim housing, benefits, school places, dentist, health etc

a true contributor, who loves the britain

she's just misunderstood

the greta thunberg of the terrorist world
Poster of the Year

End the Woke

End Israeli Genocide

Stop The Planned War On Iraq & Iran

End The WEF, World Bank & Other Corrupt Scumbags

Supporting African Indepedence

End The Tyranny Of The Dollar

Supporting Texas

User avatar
Saints11
Registered user
Posts: 898
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Sat next to you. . .

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Saints11 »

Zambo wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:43 pm
delboy1983 wrote: Fri Feb 26, 2021 8:12 pm There is no upside to allow her back.
Would be a trial and considerable jail sentence
She would get legal aid
This would cost a lot of money.
This way -no cost
Her lawyers have been paid by the British taxpayer.
This is not a bad thing.

Everybody needs someone competent fighting their corner (no matter how serious the crime) as a competent defensive / prosecution gives credibility to the verdict.

I assume she has no money, so would be unable to hire someone capable, so being funded by the Tax payer is better in the long run. As no one can argue her solicitor was shit and her case reviewed on those grounds.

That's my understanding anyway.
mentioning other members is not allowed in signatures

Jim1981
Registered user
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:27 am

Re: ISIS Brides

Post by Jim1981 »

I like her me.

Post Reply