warmleatherette wrote:Roy Twing wrote:warmleatherette wrote:Royal24s wrote:warmleatherette wrote:Royal24s wrote:Ralph wrote:Royal24s wrote:Ralph wrote:The advertising industry exists to sell us stuff (we don’t need). That’s it. Anyone seeing some other agenda is drifting into the realms of paranoia.
Ignoring the fact that there may well be additional agendas at work, don't you find the methodology at all worrying?
I’m concerned about the ability of incredibly wealthy zealots to spend as much as they like on social media influencing elections under a cloak of secrecy. That needs to be reigned in ASAP.
I’m not worried about too many pretend mixed race families in insurance & yoghurt adverts during episodes of Coronation Street. I’m baffled why anyone would be.
So basically propoganda is okay if it's promoting something you agree with but very bad if it's about something you disagree with.
Propaganda of what, promoting interracial relationships?
Which actually seems to answer my question to Ralph very honestly.
Propoganda is a very dishonest and undesirable practice. It's a weapon of war really and can be resorted to in that circumstance.
It really doesn't matter what anyone might intend or to achieve from its use , it's simply not a method which can or should be applied to civilians in peacetime for any reason
Answer the question don’t give me word salad.
Seemed to me to be pretty well answered.
The establishment believes that we would all be better off if we shared their view of a utopian future for the developed world, and they are making damned sure the message is being rammed down our throats from whatever source is available to them.
And as royal alluded to, - it doesn't matter if the message is an altruistic one, it is still social engineering.
More word salad, it’s a shame you haven’t got them balls to say what you mean, it’s pretty obvious to anyone with a half a brain...
And more attempted tarring - you 'virtue signallers' or whatever the trendy london bubble phrase of the moment is, are truly despicable.