George Galloway

[lambrini]

I don’t understand why some people are so creeped out by gay and lesbian relationships.

Or LGBT flags.

Why do you follow me around the forum like a lost puppy dog whenever I mention LGBT?

Not following at all. I'm pointing out your inconsistency or double standards on gay rights. You get triggered by the sight of the LGBT flag yet now you try to pull the " being gay is ok" act purely as a means of condemning galloway.

By all means disagree with him but at least avoid having double standards on the matter.

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

As for following me around, you most certainly are. In another thread where I mentioned LGBT, you implied that my bisexuality wasn't genuine. My sexuality is none of your business.

Your double standards are the issue. Nothing else

What double standards? I don’t support the ideology. This is completely different from believing in LGBT rights, including gay marriage and the freedom for individuals to openly be homosexual and bisexual without fear of persecution.

HSBC and Tesco "celebrating" people's sexuality, like during Pride Month, and local councils installing an LGBTQIA+ crossings, doesn't improve mine or anyone else's lives. Sexuality is none of their business.

[lambrini]

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

Pretty much.

^^^ This

[Vespa]

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

Pretty much.

Slipping into George galloway territory there, I see.

I've been in the gay rights movement most of my life, you seem to think it's a prop.

[Vespa]

I don’t understand why some people are so creeped out by gay and lesbian relationships.

Or LGBT flags.

Why do you follow me around the forum like a lost puppy dog whenever I mention LGBT?

Not following at all. I'm pointing out your inconsistency or double standards on gay rights. You get triggered by the sight of the LGBT flag yet now you try to pull the " being gay is ok" act purely as a means of condemning galloway.

By all means disagree with him but at least avoid having double standards on the matter.

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

As for following me around, you most certainly are. In another thread where I mentioned LGBT, you implied that my bisexuality wasn't genuine. My sexuality is none of your business.

Your double standards are the issue. Nothing else

What double standards? I don’t support the ideology. This is completely different from believing in LGBT rights, including gay marriage and the freedom for individuals to openly be homosexual and bisexual without fear of persecution.

HSBC and Tesco "celebrating" people's sexuality, like during Pride Month, and local councils installing an LGBTQIA+ crossings, doesn't improve mine or anyone else's lives. Sexuality is none of their business.

People don't understand that gay rights is about equality for people sexually attracted to the same sex. This has nothing to do with gender.

[The Tick]

What double standards? I don’t support the ideology. This is completely different from believing in LGBT rights, including gay marriage and the freedom for individuals to openly be homosexual and bisexual without fear of persecution.

HSBC and Tesco "celebrating" people's sexuality, like during Pride Month, and local councils installing an LGBTQIA+ crossings, doesn't improve mine or anyone else's lives. Sexuality is none of their business.

The original rainbow lgbt flag (without the recent add ons) of the gay rights movement is something that you've poured scorn on to. You've also opposed companies including gay kisses in their television adverts.

Yet now you've become the champion of the right of people to love who they want. That is a double standard.

[lambrini]

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

Pretty much.

Slipping into George galloway territory there, I see.

Initially you implied my bisexuality wasn't genuine because I didn’t support the ideology and now you're accusing Vespa, a gay man, of homophobic tendencies after agreeing with me.

Tick always makes sense!

[lambrini]

What double standards? I don’t support the ideology. This is completely different from believing in LGBT rights, including gay marriage and the freedom for individuals to openly be homosexual and bisexual without fear of persecution.

HSBC and Tesco "celebrating" people's sexuality, like during Pride Month, and local councils installing an LGBTQIA+ crossings, doesn't improve mine or anyone else's lives. Sexuality is none of their business.

The original rainbow lgbt flag (without the recent add ons) of the gay rights movement is something that you've poured scorn on to. You've also opposed companies including gay kisses in their television adverts.

Yet now you've become the champion of the right of people to love who they want. That is a double standard.

Jog on, Tick. You've lost this one.

[The Tick]

"Jog on"?

Someone's been watching too many Danny dyer films. Pwopa londoner an' all dat.

Well if you're not willing to make a sensible counter then you're not convincing anyone of your argument.

[Vespa]

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

Pretty much.

Slipping into George galloway territory there, I see.

Initially you implied my bisexuality wasn't genuine because I didn’t support the ideology and now you're accusing Vespa, a gay man, of homophobic tendencies after agreeing with me.

Tick always makes sense!

People can call me homophobic I don't care. Tick is defending a homophobe in this thread and moaning about others - weird.

[lambrini]

"Jog on"?

Someone's been watching too many Danny dyer films. Pwopa londoner an' all dat.

Well if you're not willing to make a sensible counter then you're not convincing anyone of your argument.

And now he resorts to personal insults. Sad.

[lambrini]

The ideological "LGBTQIA+" movement and being gay, lesbian or whatever, are two entirely different things, Tick. Not all LGBT individuals support the movement.

Pretty much.

Slipping into George galloway territory there, I see.

Initially you implied my bisexuality wasn't genuine because I didn’t support the ideology and now you're accusing Vespa, a gay man, of homophobic tendencies after agreeing with me.

Tick always makes sense!

People can call me homophobic I don't care. Tick is defending a homophobe in this thread and moaning about others - weird.

+1

[The Tick]

"Jog on"?

Someone's been watching too many Danny dyer films. Pwopa londoner an' all dat.

Well if you're not willing to make a sensible counter then you're not convincing anyone of your argument.

And now he resorts to personal insults. Sad.

Where's the personal insult?

[Carlos J]

Don't bother answering in this thread, Lambrini.

Take it to the 'off topic posts' thread in Pandemonium. Any more off topic shit in this thread from you and Tick will be binned.

[lambrini]

Don't bother answering in this thread, Lambrini.

Where's the personal insult?

You're quick to judge, Carlos. Tick posted this almost an hour ago, and I haven't responded.

Cheers.

[birdie]

Galloway is a Marmite figure, but you cant get away with the fact that he's a very good orator, usually runs rings around most reporters.